ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2010
Vibrotactile masking experiments reveal accelerated somatosensory processing in congenitally blind braille readers.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The somatosensory temporal discrimination threshold changes after a placebo procedure.Experimental brain research · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Predictions of bimanual self-touch determine the temporal tuning of somatosensory perception.iScience · 2025Article
- Alterations in cortical and thalamic connections of somatosensory cortex following early loss of vision.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2019Article
- Comparing Tactile to Auditory Guidance for Blind Individuals.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- Superior non-specific motor learning in the blind.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Article
- Characterization of sex-based differences in the mechanical properties of human finger glabrous tissue using a fiberoptic sensor.Journal of biomechanics · 2014Article
- The effects of negative emotions on sensory perception: fear but not anger decreases tactile sensitivity.Frontiers in psychology · 2014Article
- Masking of sounds by a background noise--cochlear mechanical correlates.The Journal of physiology · 2013Article
- Repetition suppression for speech processing in the associative occipital and parietal cortex of congenitally blind adults.PloS one · 2013Article
- Tactile spatial acuity enhancement in blindness: evidence for experience-dependent mechanisms.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Braille reading is a demanding task that requires the identification of rapidly varying tactile patterns. During proficient reading, neighboring characters impact the fingertip at ∼100 ms intervals, and adjacent raised dots within a character at 50 ms intervals. Because the brain requires time to interpret afferent sensorineural activity, among other reasons, tactile stimuli separated by such short temporal intervals pose a challenge to perception. How, then, do proficient Braille readers successfully interpret inputs arising from their fingertips at such rapid rates? We hypothesized that somatosensory perceptual consolidation occurs more rapidly in proficient Braille readers. If so, Braille readers should outperform sighted participants on masking tasks, which demand rapid perceptual processing, but would not necessarily outperform the sighted on tests of simple vibrotactile sensitivity. To investigate, we conducted two-interval forced-choice vibrotactile detection, amplitude discrimination, and masking tasks on the index fingertips of 89 sighted and 57 profoundly blind humans. Sighted and blind participants had similar unmasked detection (25 ms target tap) and amplitude discrimination (compared with 100 μm reference tap) thresholds, but congenitally blind Braille readers, the fastest readers among the blind participants, exhibited significantly less masking than the sighted (masker, 50 Hz, 50 μm; target-masker delays, ±50 and ±100 ms). Indeed, Braille reading speed correlated significantly and specifically with masking task performance, and in particular with the backward masking decay time constant. We conclude that vibrotactile sensitivity is unchanged but that perceptual processing is accelerated in congenitally blind Braille readers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.