Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20979558›Full record

ArticleExpert review of clinical immunology2010

An update on the use of NOD mice to study autoimmune (Type 1) diabetes.

Rodolfo José Chaparro, Teresa P Dilorenzo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Expert review of clinical immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. NOD Mice Recapitulate the Cardiac Disturbances Observed in Type 1 Diabetes.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impaired insulin signaling in the B10.D2-American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Rodolfo José ChaparroDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA.
Teresa P Dilorenzo

Funding

Molecular NeuropathologyT32NS007098 · NINDS · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI SANTAMBROGIO, LAURA · 1985 to 2015
$5.0M
Antigens Recognized by CD8+ T Cells in Type 1 DiabetesR01DK064315 · NIDDK · YESHIVA UNIVERSITY · PI DILORENZO, TERESA P · 2003 to 2015
$3.8M
T Cell Tolerance by DEC-205-mediated Islet Antigen Delivery to Dendritic CellsR56AI088256 · NIAID · ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DILORENZO, TERESA P · 2010 to 2010
$282k
NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI088256NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK064315NINDS NIH HHS NS07098NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS007098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The widely used nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse model of autoimmune (Type 1) diabetes mellitus shares multiple characteristics with the human disease, and studies employing this model continue to yield clinically relevant and important information. Here, we review some of the recent key findings obtained from NOD mouse investigations that have both advanced our understanding of disease pathogenesis and suggested new therapeutic targets and approaches. Areas discussed include antigen discovery, identification of genes and pathways contributing to disease susceptibility, development of strategies to image islet inflammation and the testing of therapeutics. We also review recent technical advances that, combined with an improved understanding of the NOD mouse model's limitations, should work to ensure its popularity, utility and relevance in the years ahead.

Indexed as

Mice, Inbred NODAnimalsAutoantigensDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1Disease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoveryGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansImmunologic TechniquesMiceAutoantigens

Identifiers

PMID20979558
PMCPMC3024552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.