Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20978519›Full record

SynthesisJournal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism2011

Preclinical drug evaluation for combination therapy in acute stroke using systematic review, meta-analysis, and subsequent experimental testing.

Victoria E O'Collins, Malcolm R Macleod, Susan F Cox, Leena Van Raay, Elena Aleksoska, Geoffrey A Donnan, David W Howells

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. PRIMEDTranslational stroke research · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. An Ultrastructural Perspective on Cell Death.Jordan medical journal · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Evidence for the Benefits of Melatonin in Cardiovascular Disease.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Melatonin: Countering Chaotic Time Cues.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Victoria E O'CollinsDepartment of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia. ocollins@unimelb.edu.au
Malcolm R Macleod
Susan F Cox
Leena Van Raay
Elena Aleksoska
Geoffrey A Donnan
David W Howells
University of Melbourne · AUFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health · AUNational Stroke Foundation · AUUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is some evidence that in animal models of acute ischaemic stroke, combinations of neuroprotective agents might be more efficacious than the same agents administered alone. Hence, we developed pragmatic, empirical criteria based on therapeutic target, cost, availability, efficacy, administration, and safety to select drugs for testing in combination in animal models of acute stroke. Magnesium sulphate, melatonin, and minocycline were chosen from a library of neuroprotective agents, and were tested in a more 'realistic' model favoured by the STAIR (Stroke Therapy Academic Industry Roundtable). Outcome was assessed with infarct volume, neurologic score, and two newly developed scales measuring general health and physiologic homeostasis. Owing to the failure to achieve neuroprotection in aged, hypertensive animals with drug delivery at 3 hours, the bar was lowered in successive experiments to determine whether neuroprotection could be achieved under conditions more conducive to recovery. Testing in younger animals showed more favourable homeostasis and general health scores than did testing in older animals, but infarct volume and neurologic scores did not differ with age, and treatment efficacy was again not shown. Testing with shorter occlusions resulted in smaller infarct volumes; nevertheless, treatment efficacy was still not observed. It was concluded that this combination, in these stroke models, was not effective.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAnimalsDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalDrug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationMagnesium SulfateMelatoninMinocyclineNeuroprotective AgentsRatsSeverity of Illness IndexStrokeTreatment OutcomeMagnesium SulfateMelatoninMinocyclineNeuroprotective Agents

Identifiers

PMID20978519
PMCPMC3063631
OpenAlexW2170389605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.