Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20978384›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2010

Strategies for eliciting HIV-1 inhibitory antibodies.

Georgia D Tomaras, Barton F Haynes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Designing tomorrow's vaccines.The New England journal of medicine · 2013
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The design and evaluation of HIV-1 vaccines.AIDS (London, England) · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Georgia D TomarasDuke Human Vaccine Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. gdt@duke.edu
Barton F Haynes
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University Hospital · US

Funding

LC: HIV Vaccine Trials NetworkUM1AI068618 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI Margaret Juliana McElrath · 2011 to 2026
$483.6M
Viral Sequencing CoreU19AI067854 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BHARDWAJ, NINA · 2006 to 2011
$290.5M
Statistical and Data Management Center-Pediatric,Adolescent, and Maternal CTGUM1AI068616 · NIAID · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Sean Scott Brummel, Marlene Ann Cooper · 2011 to 2026
$155.6M
HVTN Laboratory ProgramU01AI068618 · NIAID · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI MCELRATH, MARGARET JULIANA · 2006 to 2010
$82.6M
Social and Behavioral Sciences CoreP30AI064518 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Nwora Lance Okeke · 2005 to 2026
$50.5M
Statistical and Data Management Center-Pediatric,Adolescent, and Maternal CTGU01AI068616 · NIAID · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SHAPIRO, DAVID ERIC · 2006 to 2010
$38.6M
HIV, TB, and Malaria Vaccine Development for AfricaP01AI052816 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, BARTON F · 2003 to 2007
$14.5M
Neutralizing Antibody Induction by Centralized GenesP01AI061734 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI HAYNES, BARTON F. · 2005 to 2009
$11.7M
HIV-1 Gene Suppression by CD8+ T CellsR01AI052779 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI TOMARAS, GEORGIA DORIS · 2003 to 2010
$1.9M
NIAID NIH HHS AI068616NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI052816NIAID NIH HHS P01AI052816NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI061734NIAID NIH HHS P01AI061734NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI064518NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI052779NIAID NIH HHS R01AI052779NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068618NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI067854NIAID NIH HHS U19AI067854NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068618
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMajor roadblocks persist in the development of vaccines that elicit potent neutralizing antibodies targeting diverse HIV-1 strains, similar to known broadly neutralizing HIV-1 human monoclonal antibodies. Alternatively, other types of anti-HIV-1 envelope antibodies that may not neutralize HIV-1 in traditional neutralization assays but have other anti-HIV-1 activities (hereafter termed HIV-1 inhibitory antibodies) can be elicited by current vaccine strategies, and numerous studies are exploring their roles in preventing HIV-1 acquisition. We review examples of strategies for eliciting potentially protective HIV-1 inhibitory antibodies. RECENT

findingsHeterologous prime-boost strategies can yield anti-HIV immune responses, although only one (canarypox prime, Env protein boost) has been tested and shown positive results in an efficacy trial (RV144). Although the immune correlates of protection are as yet undefined, the reduced rate of acquisition without a significant effect on initial viral loads or CD4 T-cell counts, have raised the hypothesis of an RV144 vaccine-elicited transient protective B-cell response. SUMMARY: In light of the RV144 trial, there is a critical need to define the entire functional spectrum of anti-HIV-1 antibodies, how easily each can be elicited, and how effective different types of antibody effector mechanisms can be in prevention of HIV-1 transmission.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingClinical Trials as TopicHIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV InfectionsHumansImmunization, SecondaryVaccinationAIDS VaccinesAntibodies, NeutralizingHIV Antibodies

Identifiers

PMID20978384
PMCPMC3516814
OpenAlexW2057398624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.