Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20978376›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2010

New approaches to design HIV-1 T-cell vaccines.

Hélène Perrin, Glenda Canderan, Rafick-Pierre Sékaly, Lydie Trautmann

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hélène PerrinVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute - Florida, Port Saint Lucie, Florida, USA.
Glenda Canderan
Rafick-Pierre Sékaly
Lydie Trautmann

Funding

Targeting Dendritic Cells for Enhanced Musocal ImmunityU19AI057234 · NIAID · BAYLOR RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI LEGRAND, ROGER · 2003 to 2013
$49.2M
Specimen Acquisition and Distribution CoreP01AI076174 · NIAID · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI LANDAY, ALAN L · 2008 to 2012
$10.9M
Novel Concepts for the Eradication of HIVDP1DA028871 · NIDA · VGTI FLORIDA · PI SEKALY, RAFICK PIERRE · 2009 to 2013
$4.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI076174-01A1NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI076174NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI057234NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA028871PHS HHS IDPIDA028871-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewFollowing the evidence that T-cell responses are crucial in the control of HIV-1 infection, vaccines targeting T-cell responses were tested in recent clinical trials. However, these vaccines showed a lack of efficacy. This review attempts to define the qualitative and quantitative features that are desirable for T-cell-induced responses by vaccines. We also describe strategies that could lead to achievement of this goal. RECENT

findingsUsing the yellow fever vaccine as a benchmark of an efficient vaccine, recent studies identified factors of immune protection and more importantly innate immune pathways needed for the establishment of long-term protective adaptive immunity. SUMMARY: To prevent or control HIV-1 infection, a vaccine must induce efficient and persistent antigen-specific T cells endowed with mucosal homing capacity. Such cells should have the capability to counteract HIV-1 diversity and its rapid spread from the initial site of infection. To achieve this goal, the activation of a diversified innate immune response is critical. New systems biology approaches will provide more precise correlates of immune protection that will pave the way for new approaches in T-cell-based vaccines.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansSystems BiologyT-LymphocytesAIDS Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID20978376
PMCPMC2972542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.