Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20978177›Full record

ArticleCancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology2010

Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer mortality.

Kathryn L Penney, Saumyadipta Pyne, Fredrick R Schumacher, Jennifer A Sinnott, Lorelei A Mucci, Peter L Kraft, Jing Ma, William K Oh, Tobias Kurth, Philip W Kantoff and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Genome-wide association study of prostate cancer-specific survival.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Common genetic variation of the calcium-sensing receptor and lethal prostate cancer risk.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Kathryn L PenneyDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Saumyadipta Pyne
Fredrick R Schumacher
Jennifer A Sinnott
Lorelei A Mucci
Peter L Kraft
Jing Ma
William K Oh
Tobias Kurth
Philip W Kantoff
Edward L Giovannucci
Meir J Stampfer
David J Hunter
Matthew L Freedman

Funding

Validity of Diet and Activity Measures in WomenP01CA055075 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI WILLETT, WALTER C. · 1991 to 2009
$41.8M
Tumor and Circulating Markers as Links Between Obesity and Lethal Prostate CanceP50CA090381 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI LODA, MASSIMO · 2002 to 2017
$36.2M
Training Program in Cancer EpidemiologyT32CA009001 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (SCH OF PUBLIC HLTH) · PI A. Heather Eliassen, Meir Stampfer · 1985 to 2026
$17.3M
Physicians' Health Study II: Prevention Trial of VitaminsR01CA097193 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GAZIANO, J. MICHAEL · 2002 to 2011
$15.7M
AN NCRR CENTER FOR HIGH THROUGHPUT SNP GENOTYPING AND ANALYSIS: GAIN NETWORKU54RR020278 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GABRIEL, STACEY · 2004 to 2008
$14.4M
Fine mapping and characterization of the 8q24 prostate cancer risk locusR01CA129435 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI FREEDMAN, MATTHEW L · 2007 to 2009
$1.5M
RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF ASPIRIN AND MORTALITYR01CA040360 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E · 1985 to 2002
$775k
TRIAL OF ASPIRIN AND BETA-CAROTENE IN U S MD'SR01HL034595 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BURING, JULIE E · 1985 to 1991
–
NCI NIH HHS CA-097193NCI NIH HHS CA-34944NCI NIH HHS CA-40360NCI NIH HHS CA-55075NCI NIH HHS P01 CA055075NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090381NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090381-08NCI NIH HHS R01 CA034944NCI NIH HHS R01 CA040360NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097193NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129435NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009001NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009001-34NCRR NIH HHS U54 RR020278NHLBI NIH HHS HL-26490NHLBI NIH HHS HL-34595NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL026490NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL034595
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA pressing clinical issue in prostate cancer is to distinguish which men will have an indolent or aggressive course of disease. Clinical variables such as Gleason grade and stage are useful predictors of lethal cancer; however, the low predictive values of the common Gleason scores, changes in grading over time, and earlier diagnosis of patients due to screening limits their clinical utility. Identifying genetic variants associated with lethal prostate cancer could inform clinical decision making.

methodsWe conducted a genome-wide association study, comparing lethal prostate cancer cases to cases surviving at least 10 years beyond their initial diagnosis. Genotyping was done with the Affymetrix 5.0 chip [∼500,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) and 1,483 copy number variants (CNV)] on DNA from participants in the Physicians' Health Study and Health Professionals Follow-up Study (196 lethal cases, 368 long-term survivors). After excluding SNPs and individuals based on quality control criteria, logistic regression assuming an additive model was done using the PLINK software.

resultsNo SNP reached genome-wide significance (P ≤ 1 × 10(-7)); however, three independent SNPs had P < 1 × 10(-5). One top-ranked SNP replicated (P = 0.05) in an independent follow-up study. Although no CNV had genome-wide significance, 14 CNVs showed nominal association with prostate cancer mortality (P < 0.05).

conclusionsNo variants were significantly associated at a genome-wide level with prostate cancer mortality. Common genetic determinants of lethal prostate cancer are likely to have odds ratios <2.0. IMPACT: Genetic markers identified could provide biological insight to improve therapy for men with potentially fatal cancer. Larger studies are necessary to detect the genetic causes of prostate cancer mortality.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyGene DosageGenetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenotypeHumansMaleOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProstatic NeoplasmsGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID20978177
PMCPMC3197738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.