ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2010
Decision aids and uptake of screening.
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Persuasive Interventions for Controversial Cancer Screening Recommendations: Testing a Novel Approach to Help Patients Make Evidence-Based Decisions.Annals of family medicine · 2017Trial
- Cost effectiveness of a web-based decision aid for parents deciding about MMR vaccination: a three-arm cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Effect of evidence based risk information on "informed choice" in colorectal cancer screening: randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2011Trial
- Keeping the patient in the center: Common challenges in the practice of shared decision making.Patient education and counseling · 2018Article
- Responses to Overdiagnosis in Thyroid Cancer Screening among Korean Women.Cancer research and treatment · 2016Article
- Examining the role of a decision aid in reducing decisional conflict amongst hospital healthcare workers towards receiving the influenza vaccine.BMC health services research · 2016Article
- Informed choice in bowel cancer screening: a qualitative study to explore how adults with lower education use decision aids.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2014Article
- What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?CA: a cancer journal for clinicians · 2013Review
- Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2013Article
- Balancing the presentation of information and options in patient decision aids: an updated review.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2013Review
- Are women ready for the new cervical screening protocol in England? A systematic review and qualitative synthesis of views about human papillomavirus testing.British journal of cancer · 2012Article
- Communicating risk to patients and the public.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012Article
- Patients' expectations of screening and preventive treatments.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20978061What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.