ArticleExpert review of neurotherapeutics2010
Are early infectious exposures involved in the etiology of childhood CNS tumors?
Article in Expert review of neurotherapeutics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evaluation of: Schmidt LS, Kamper-Jorgensen M, Schmeigelow K et al. Infectious exposure in the first years of life and risk of central nervous system tumours in children: analysis of birth order, childcare attendance and seasonality of birth. Br. J. Cancer 102(11), 1670-1675 (2010). Early infectious exposures have been implicated in the etiology of childhood CNS tumors. The article evaluated here assesses whether infectious exposure in the first years of life is involved by analyzing birth order, childcare attendance and seasonality of birth. The conclusion is that exposure to infectious disease in early childhood does not play an important role in the etiology of pediatric CNS tumors. It is noted that the measures used are only proxies for infectious exposures and, as such, may not accurately reflect the underlying infectious burden. Furthermore, this study is from the Nordic countries and from a later period than previous studies. Differences in patterns of exposure to infection may vary geographically between countries and may have changed over time. However, the authors have not excluded the possibility that a specific infectious agent is involved, and it is agreed here that future efforts should include a focus on a search for such an agent or agents, as well as formulating plausible, diagnostic-specific, mechanistic hypotheses.
Identifiers
20977324What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.