Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20976614›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2011

Which therapy works better in choroid plexus carcinomas?

Su G Berrak, Diane D Liu, Brigitte Wrede, Johannes E Wolff

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Case Report:Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Response to combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy of a leptomeningeal spread from choroid plexus carcinoma: case report.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2015
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Clinical outcome of pediatric choroid plexus tumors: retrospective analysis from a single institute.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2014
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Su G BerrakDepartment of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Marmara University Medical Center, Altunizade, Istanbul, Turkey.
Diane D Liu
Brigitte Wrede
Johannes E Wolff
Marmara University · TRThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USTufts Medical Center · USUniversity of Regensburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Choroid plexus carcinomas (CPCs) are rare tumors with dismal outcome. While it has been established that surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy improve survival, the best chemotherapy drugs for treating this disease still need to be identified. Since CPC is too rare to permit a prospective clinical trial, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effects of individual drugs in patients with CPCs. We expanded a pre-existing database and included all cases of choroid plexus tumors, identified in PubMed through the end of 2007, for a total of 906 patients. At first, we restricted the analysis to patients with histologically confirmed CPC (n = 361) and with residual tumor after surgery (n = 130/361 patients), and we compared response and survival between patients who received a particular drug and those who did not. Response to chemotherapy was documented in 43 patients. Of the drugs used in these patients, etoposide was associated with the highest response rate (17/36). Next survival was compared among all CPC. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests suggested a statistically significant treatment benefit for cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and carboplatin, while the effect of vincristine was found to be marginally significant (P = 0.07, log rank). Of these, only etoposide's effect could be confirmed in a limited Cox multiple regression analysis. In conclusion, etoposide should be included in future standard treatment protocols. However the survival rates are still unsatisfactory, and additional novel drugs should be studied in prospective multicenter studies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCarboplatinChoroid Plexus NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCyclophosphamideEtoposideHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRadiotherapySurvival RateTreatment OutcomeVincristineCarboplatinCyclophosphamideEtoposideVincristine

Identifiers

PMID20976614
OpenAlexW1976285924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.