ArticlePloS one2010
Of bits and bugs--on the use of bioinformatics and a bacterial crystal structure to solve a eukaryotic repeat-protein structure.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unveiling Putative Functions of Burkholderia pseudomallei K96243 Hypothetical Proteins Via High-Throughput Characterization of Structural Similarities.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2026Article
- The prokaryotic origins of the COMMD protein family involved in eukaryotic membrane trafficking.Nature communications · 2026Article
- PURA protein mislocalisation in the nucleus: mechanistic basis for transcriptional dysregulation and DNA unwinding deficits in a model of the p.L148Wfs*77Journal of medical genetics · 2025Article
- Virulence Regulation inMicroorganisms · 2025Review
- PURA syndrome-causing mutations impair PUR-domain integrity and affect P-body association.eLife · 2024Article
- The Lyme disease spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi, as a model vector-borne pathogen: insights on regulation of gene and protein expression.Current opinion in microbiology · 2023Review
- The Consistent Tick-Vertebrate Infectious Cycle of the Lyme Disease Spirochete Enables Borrelia burgdorferi To Control Protein Expression by Monitoring Its Physiological Status.Journal of bacteriology · 2022Review
- The Molecular Function of PURA and Its Implications in Neurological Diseases.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Gene Regulation and Transcriptomics.Current issues in molecular biology · 2021Article
- The large family of PC4-like domains - similar folds and functions throughout all kingdoms of life.RNA biology · 2020Article
- The Lyme disease spirochete's BpuR DNA/RNA-binding protein is differentially expressed during the mammal-tick infectious cycle, which affects translation of the SodA superoxide dismutase.Molecular microbiology · 2019Article
- Structural and functional analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphic variants of purine-rich element-binding protein B.Journal of cellular biochemistry · 2019Article
- Review
- Electrostatic and Hydrophobic Interactions Mediate Single-Stranded DNA Recognition and Acta2 Repression by Purine-Rich Element-Binding Protein B.Biochemistry · 2016Article
- Article
- Manual classification strategies in the ECOD database.Proteins · 2015Article
- Posttranscriptional self-regulation by the Lyme disease bacterium's BpuR DNA/RNA-binding protein.Journal of bacteriology · 2013Article
- Bpur, the Lyme disease spirochete's PUR domain protein: identification as a transcriptional modulator and characterization of nucleic acid interactions.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Structural basis of multisite single-stranded DNA recognition and ACTA2 repression by purine-rich element binding protein B (Purβ).Biochemistry · 2013Article
- The pur protein family: genetic and structural features in development and disease.Journal of cellular physiology · 2013Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pur-α is a nucleic acid-binding protein involved in cell cycle control, transcription, and neuronal function. Initially no prediction of the three-dimensional structure of Pur-α was possible. However, recently we solved the X-ray structure of Pur-α from the fruitfly Drosophila melanogaster and showed that it contains a so-called PUR domain. Here we explain how we exploited bioinformatics tools in combination with X-ray structure determination of a bacterial homolog to obtain diffracting crystals and the high-resolution structure of Drosophila Pur-α. First, we used sensitive methods for remote-homology detection to find three repetitive regions in Pur-α. We realized that our lack of understanding how these repeats interact to form a globular domain was a major problem for crystallization and structure determination. With our information on the repeat motifs we then identified a distant bacterial homolog that contains only one repeat. We determined the bacterial crystal structure and found that two of the repeats interact to form a globular domain. Based on this bacterial structure, we calculated a computational model of the eukaryotic protein. The model allowed us to design a crystallizable fragment and to determine the structure of Drosophila Pur-α. Key for success was the fact that single repeats of the bacterial protein self-assembled into a globular domain, instructing us on the number and boundaries of repeats to be included for crystallization trials with the eukaryotic protein. This study demonstrates that the simpler structural domain arrangement of a distant prokaryotic protein can guide the design of eukaryotic crystallization constructs. Since many eukaryotic proteins contain multiple repeats or repeating domains, this approach might be instructive for structural studies of a range of proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.