ArticlePloS one2010
Genome-wide comparative gene family classification.
Article in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bayesian inference of genetic pleiotropy identifies drug targets and repurposable medicines for human complex diseases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Exploring genome gene content and morphological analysis to test recalcitrant nodes in the animal phylogeny.PloS one · 2023Article
- A Systematic Phylogenomic Classification of the Multidrug and Toxic Compound Extrusion Transporter Gene Family in Plants.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Heuristic algorithms for best match graph editing.Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB · 2021Article
- Identification of Novel Variants in Cleft Palate-Associated Genes in Brazilian Patients With Non-syndromic Cleft Palate Only.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Identification of shared and unique gene families associated with oral clefts.International journal of oral science · 2017Article
- Diversification of R2R3-MYB Transcription Factors in the Tomato Family Solanaceae.Journal of molecular evolution · 2016Article
- Misannotation Awareness: A Tale of Two Gene-Groups.Frontiers in plant science · 2016Article
- Genome-wide variations in a natural isolate of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Unique features of the loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) megagenome revealed through sequence annotation.Genetics · 2014Article
- ITEP: an integrated toolkit for exploration of microbial pan-genomes.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Identifying gene clusters by discovering common intervals in indeterminate strings.BMC genomics · 2014Article
- Variant surface antigens of malaria parasites: functional and evolutionary insights from comparative gene family classification and analysis.BMC genomics · 2013Article
- Ortho2ExpressMatrix--a web server that interprets cross-species gene expression data by gene family information.BMC genomics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Correct classification of genes into gene families is important for understanding gene function and evolution. Although gene families of many species have been resolved both computationally and experimentally with high accuracy, gene family classification in most newly sequenced genomes has not been done with the same high standard. This project has been designed to develop a strategy to effectively and accurately classify gene families across genomes. We first examine and compare the performance of computer programs developed for automated gene family classification. We demonstrate that some programs, including the hierarchical average-linkage clustering algorithm MC-UPGMA and the popular Markov clustering algorithm TRIBE-MCL, can reconstruct manual curation of gene families accurately. However, their performance is highly sensitive to parameter setting, i.e. different gene families require different program parameters for correct resolution. To circumvent the problem of parameterization, we have developed a comparative strategy for gene family classification. This strategy takes advantage of existing curated gene families of reference species to find suitable parameters for classifying genes in related genomes. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this novel strategy, we use TRIBE-MCL to classify chemosensory and ABC transporter gene families in C. elegans and its four sister species. We conclude that fully automated programs can establish biologically accurate gene families if parameterized accordingly. Comparative gene family classification finds optimal parameters automatically, thus allowing rapid insights into gene families of newly sequenced species.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.