Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20976125›Full record

ArticleClinical & developmental immunology2010

Tumor antigen cross-presentation and the dendritic cell: where it all begins?

Alison M McDonnell, Bruce W S Robinson, Andrew J Currie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical & developmental immunology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. What do cancer-specific T cells 'see'?Discovery immunology · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. HLA-B*44 and C*01 Prevalence Correlates with Covid19 Spreading across Italy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Observational
  10. Article
  11. NaCl Nanoparticles as a Cancer Therapeutic.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Immune Evasion Strategies of Glioblastoma.Frontiers in surgery · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alison M McDonnellSchool of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia.
Bruce W S Robinson
Andrew J Currie

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) that are critical for the generation of effective cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) responses; however, their function and phenotype are often defective or altered in tumor-bearing hosts, which may limit their capacity to mount an effective tumor-specific CTL response. In particular, the manner in which exogenous tumor antigens are acquired, processed, and cross-presented to CD8 T cells by DCs in tumor-bearing hosts is not well understood, but may have a profound effect on antitumor immunity. In this paper, we have examined the role of DCs in the cross-presentation of tumor antigen in terms of their subset, function, migration, and location with the intention of examining the early processes that contribute to the development of an ineffective anti-tumor immune response.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigen PresentationAntigens, NeoplasmCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesCross-PrimingDendritic CellsMiceMice, TransgenicAntigens, Neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID20976125
PMCPMC2957101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.