Trial reportPloS one2010
Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of three regimens for prevention of malaria: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Ugandan schoolchildren.
Trial report in PloS one, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
IPT in Schoolchildren: Comparison of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Antimalarial Regimens in Uganda
'SCHOOL-BASED TREATMENT WITH ACT TO REDUCE TRANSMISSION' (START-IPT): Evaluation of the Community Impact of Intermittent Preventive Treatment for Malaria in Ugandan Children: a Cluster Randomised Trial
Evaluation of the Household-level Impact of a Single Round of Intermittent Preventive Treatment of Malaria in Schoolchildren: A Randomized Study
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.
- Preventive malaria treatment among school-aged children in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and meta-analyses.The Lancet. Global health · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of intermittent preventive treatment for malaria in schoolchildren: a systematic review.Malaria journal · 2015Pooled it
- Mass drug administration for malaria.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2013Pooled it
- Intermittent Preventive Treatment with Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine in Ugandan Schoolchildren Selects for Plasmodium falciparum Transporter Polymorphisms That Modify Drug Sensitivity.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2016Trial
- Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine Compared with Sulfadoxine-Pyrimethamine plus Amodiaquine for Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention in Burkina Faso.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2015Trial
- Impact of intermittent preventive treatment with dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine on malaria in Ugandan schoolchildren: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014Trial
- Impact of intermittent screening and treatment for malaria among school children in Kenya: a cluster randomised trial.PLoS medicine · 2014Trial
- Trial
- Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of piperaquine in children with uncomplicated falciparum malaria.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2012Trial
- Effects of amodiaquine and artesunate on sulphadoxine-pyrimethamine pharmacokinetic parameters in children under five in Mali.Malaria journal · 2011Trial
- Cost analysis of school-based intermittent screening and treatment of malaria in Kenya.Malaria journal · 2011Trial
- Sustained high prevalence of multiple antimalarial drug resistance markers in Uganda in 2023-2024.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2026Article
- Sustained High Prevalence of Multiple Antimalarial Drug Resistance Markers in Uganda in 2023-24.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Article
- Willingness of secondary school adolescents to get vaccinated against Malaria: a cross-sectional study in Enugu, South-East Nigeria.African health sciences · 2025Observational
- Public health impact of current and proposed age-expanded perennial malaria chemoprevention: a modelling study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Phase one of a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study to assess the feasibility, acceptability and effectiveness of implementing seasonal malaria chemoprevention in Nampula Province, Mozambique.Malaria journal · 2025Article
- A comprehensive approach to optimizing malaria prevention in pregnant women: evaluating the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and resistance of IPTp-SP and IPTp-DP.Global health action · 2023Article
- School-Based Malaria Screening and Treatment Reduces Plasmodium falciparum Infection and Anemia Prevalence in Two Transmission Settings in Malawi.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Observational
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) to assess the impact of school children's awareness of malaria using the MOSKI KIT® tool: study case of some Dakar schools in Senegal.Malaria journal · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntermittent preventive treatment (IPT) is a promising malaria control strategy; however, the optimal regimen remains unclear. We conducted a randomized, single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of a single course of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine (SP), amodiaquine + SP (AQ+SP) or dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) among schoolchildren to inform IPT.
methodsAsymptomatic girls aged 8 to 12 years and boys aged 8 to 14 years enrolled in two primary schools in Tororo, Uganda were randomized to receive one of the study regimens or placebo, regardless of presence of parasitemia at enrollment, and followed for 42 days. The primary outcome was risk of parasitemia at 42 days. Survival analysis was used to assess differences between regimens.
resultsOf 780 enrolled participants, 769 (98.6%) completed follow-up and were assigned a treatment outcome. The risk of parasitemia at 42 days varied significantly between DP (11.7% [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.9, 17.1]), AQ+SP (44.3% [37.6, 51.5]), and SP (79.7% [95% CI: 73.6, 85.2], p<0.001). The risk of parasitemia in SP-treated children was no different than in those receiving placebo (84.6% [95% CI: 79.1, 89.3], p = 0.22). No serious adverse events occurred, but AQ+SP was associated with increased risk of vomiting compared to placebo (13.0% [95% CI: 9.1, 18.5] vs. 4.7% [95% CI: 2.5, 8.8], respectively, p = 0.003).
conclusionsDP was the most efficacious and well-tolerated regimen tested, although AQ+SP appears to be a suitable alternative for IPT in schoolchildren. Use of SP for IPT may not be appropriate in areas with high-level SP resistance in Africa.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00852371.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.