Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20975945›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2010

Evidence for a Xer/dif system for chromosome resolution in archaea.

Diego Cortez, Sophie Quevillon-Cheruel, Simonetta Gribaldo, Nicole Desnoues, Guennadi Sezonov, Patrick Forterre, Marie-Claude Serre

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Archaeal tyrosine recombinases.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Open biology · 2020
    Review
  8. Pervasive Suicidal Integrases in Deep-Sea Archaea.Molecular biology and evolution · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Archaeal chromosome biology.Journal of molecular microbiology and biotechnology · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. The cell cycle of archaea.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2013
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Diego CortezInstitut Pasteur, Unité Biologie Moléculaire du Gène chez les Extrêmophiles, Paris, France.
Sophie Quevillon-Cheruel
Simonetta Gribaldo
Nicole Desnoues
Guennadi Sezonov
Patrick Forterre
Marie-Claude Serre
Biology of Extremophiles Laboratory · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInstitut Pasteur · FRInstitut de Biochimie et Biophysique Moléculaire et Cellulaire · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Homologous recombination events between circular chromosomes, occurring during or after replication, can generate dimers that need to be converted to monomers prior to their segregation at cell division. In Escherichia coli, chromosome dimers are converted to monomers by two paralogous site-specific tyrosine recombinases of the Xer family (XerC/D). The Xer recombinases act at a specific dif site located in the replication termination region, assisted by the cell division protein FtsK. This chromosome resolution system has been predicted in most Bacteria and further characterized for some species. Archaea have circular chromosomes and an active homologous recombination system and should therefore resolve chromosome dimers. Most archaea harbour a single homologue of bacterial XerC/D proteins (XerA), but not of FtsK. Therefore, the role of XerA in chromosome resolution was unclear. Here, we have identified dif-like sites in archaeal genomes by using a combination of modeling and comparative genomics approaches. These sites are systematically located in replication termination regions. We validated our in silico prediction by showing that the XerA protein of Pyrococcus abyssi specifically recombines plasmids containing the predicted dif site in vitro. In contrast to the bacterial system, XerA can recombine dif sites in the absence of protein partners. Whereas Archaea and Bacteria use a completely different set of proteins for chromosome replication, our data strongly suggest that XerA is most likely used for chromosome resolution in Archaea.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceArchaeaArchaeal ProteinsBinding SitesChromosomes, ArchaealCloning, MolecularDNA, ArchaealDNA, CircularDNA NucleotidyltransferasesDNA ReplicationElectrophoretic Mobility Shift AssayMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlasmidsProtein BindingPyrococcus abyssiArchaeal ProteinsDNA, ArchaealDNA, CircularDNA NucleotidyltransferasesSite-specific recombinase

Identifiers

PMID20975945
PMCPMC2958812
OpenAlexW2054811359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.