ArticleMedical education online2010
Development and evaluation of a Health Record Online Submission Tool (HOST).
Article in Medical education online, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Training medical students and residents in the use of electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Pooled it
- Digital Health Training Programs for Medical Students: Scoping Review.JMIR medical education · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHealth records (HRs) are crucial to quality patient care. The Michigan State University College of Human Medicine begins teaching health record (HR) writing during the second-year clinical skills courses. Prior to this project, we used a cumbersome paper system to allow graduate assistants to grade and give feedback on students' HRs. This study discusses the development and evaluates the effectiveness of the new Health Record Online Submission Tool (HOST).
methodsWe developed an electronic submission system with the goals of decreasing the logistical demands of the paper-based system; improving the effectiveness, consistency, and oversight of HR instruction and evaluation; expanding the number of students who could serve as written record graduate assistants (WRGAs); and to begin preparing students for the use of electronic health records (EHRs). We developed the initial web-based system in 2003 and upgraded it to its present form, HOST, in 2007. We evaluated the system using course evaluations, surveys of WRGAs and clinical students, and queries of course faculty and staff.
resultsCourse evaluation by 1,106 students during years 2001 through 2008 revealed that the students' self-assessment of ability to write HRs improved briefly with the introduction of HOST but then returned to baseline. The initial change to electronic submission was well received, though with continued use its rating dropped. A survey of 65 (response rate 61.3%) clinical students indicated that HOST did not completely prepare them for EHRs. The WRGAs (n = 14; response rate 58%) found the system easy to use to give feedback to students. Faculty (n = 3) and staff (n = 2) found that it saved time and made the review of students' HRs and WRGAs grading simpler. Student perception of grading consistency did not improve.
conclusionsHOST is the first published online method of in-depth HR training for preclinical students using information gathered in clinical encounters. With it we were able to maintain effective instruction, streamline course management, and significantly decrease staff time. HOST did not improve student perception of grading consistency and did not prepare students for specific EHR use. Within the context of our class size expansion and our community-based educational program, HOST bridges geography and can support future improvements in HR instruction and faculty development. Medical educators at other institutions could use a similar system to accomplish these goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.