Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20975705›Full record

ReviewNature communications2010

Mechanisms underlying beneficial plant-fungus interactions in mycorrhizal symbiosis.

Paola Bonfante, Andrea Genre

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 372 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
372citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

372 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Telomere-to-Telomere Genome Assembly ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Experimental warming decouples plant-fungal symbiont interactions and leads to a more conservative ecosystem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

312 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Paola BonfanteDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Torino and IPP-CNR, Viale P.A. Mattioli 25, Torino 10125, Italy. p.bonfante@ipp.cnr.it
Andrea Genre

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycorrhizal fungi are a heterogeneous group of diverse fungal taxa, associated with the roots of over 90% of all plant species. Recently, state-of-the-art molecular and genetic tools, coupled to high-throughput sequencing and advanced microscopy, have led to the genome and transcriptome analysis of several symbionts. Signalling pathways between plants and fungi have now been described and the identification of several novel nutrient transporters has revealed some of the cellular processes that underlie symbiosis. Thus, the contributions of each partner in a mycorrhizal association are starting to be unravelled. This new knowledge is now available for use in agricultural practices.

Indexed as

MycorrhizaePlantsSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID20975705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.