Trial reportClinical medicine & research2011
Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and lack of its lytic bacteriophages in the anterior nares of patients and healthcare workers at a rural clinic.
Trial report in Clinical medicine & research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Within-host diversity of MRSA antimicrobial resistances.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2015Article
- Complete Genome Sequence of a Staphylococcus epidermidis Bacteriophage Isolated from the Anterior Nares of Humans.Genome announcements · 2014Article
- Staphylococcus epidermidis bacteriophages from the anterior nares of humans.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNearly 30% of people in the United States are colonized with Staphylococcus aureus and 1% to 2% with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the anterior nares. However, it is not known if lytic bacteriophages against S. aureus are present in the anterior nares, and if they are, what the prevalence rate is, or if they interfere with S. aureus colonization. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of nasal carriage of S. aureus and MRSA and to screen for S. aureus lytic bacteriophages in healthcare environment workers and ambulatory patients.
methodsWe enrolled 202 individuals into this study. The anterior nares were swabbed to isolate S. aureus, MRSA, and any lytic S. aureus bacteriophages that may be present. Putative S. aureus colonies on blood agar plates were identified using gram stain, catalase and coagulase tests, and confirmed by S. aureus-specific PCR. Presence of staphylococcal lytic bacteriophages were screened by a plaque assay technique using a methicillin-sensitive reference S. aureus strain ATCC 29213.
resultsOf the 49 (24%) individuals who screened positive for S. aureus, two (1%) were positive for MRSA. None of the samples were positive for lytic bacteriophages against S. aureus. Subgroup analysis found no significant difference in the prevalence of S. aureus in the house staff compared to other healthcare environment workers or ambulatory patients of the clinic. Similarly, no significant difference in colonization was noted across the population with respect to age, sex, body mass index, or presence of diabetes mellitus.
conclusionThe prevalence of nasal carriage of S. aureus and MRSA in the studied population was 24% and 1%, respectively, similar to the rate of prevalence in the United States. The study also showed that the anterior nares do not seem to harbor lytic bacteriophages against S. aureus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.