Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20974869›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2011

Molecular investigation of resistance to the antituberculous drug ethionamide in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

F Brossier, N Veziris, C Truffot-Pernot, V Jarlier, W Sougakoff

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Effects of mutations in multiple Ethionamide-resistance-associated genes amongFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A pro-oxidant property of vitamin C to overcome the burden of latentFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Tools to Alleviate the Drug Resistance inMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. MDR Tuberculosis Treatment.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Heterologous Expression ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2021
    Article
  18. Genome analyses of 174 strains ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F BrossierNational Reference Centre for Mycobacteria, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, Paris, France.
N Veziris
C Truffot-Pernot
V Jarlier
W Sougakoff
Sorbonne Université · FRInserm · FRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethionamide (ETH) needs to be activated by the mono-oxygenase EthA, which is regulated by EthR, in order to be active against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The activated drug targets the enzyme InhA, which is involved in cell wall biosynthesis. Resistance to ETH has been reported to result from various mechanisms, including mutations altering EthA/EthR, InhA and its promoter, the NADH dehydrogenase encoded by ndh, and the MshA enzyme, involved in mycothiol biosynthesis. We searched for such mutations in 87 clinical isolates: 47 ETH-resistant (ETH(r)) isolates, 24 ETH-susceptible (ETH(s)) isolates, and 16 isolates susceptible to ETH but displaying an intermediate proportion of resistant cells (ETH(Sip); defined as ≥1% but <10% resistant cells). In 81% (38/47) of the ETH(r) isolates, we found mutations in ethA, ethR, or inhA or its promoter, which mostly corresponded to new alterations in ethA and ethR. The 9 ETH(r) isolates without a mutation in these three genes (9/47, 19%) had no mutation in ndh, and a single isolate had a mutation in mshA. Of the 16 ETH(Sip) isolates, 7 had a mutation in ethA, 8 had no detectable mutation, and 1 had a mutation in mshA. Finally, of the 24 ETH(s) isolates, 23 had no mutation in the studied genes and 1 displayed a yet unknown mutation in the inhA promoter. Globally, the mechanism of resistance to ETH remained unknown for 19% of the ETH(r) isolates, highlighting the complexity of the mechanisms of ETH resistance in M. tuberculosis.

Indexed as

Antitubercular AgentsEthionamideHumansMolecular Sequence DataMycobacterium tuberculosisPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, DNATuberculosis, Multidrug-ResistantAntitubercular AgentsEthionamide

Identifiers

PMID20974869
PMCPMC3019671
OpenAlexW2152780653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.