Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20974228›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2011

Selective knockdown of NMDA receptors in primary afferent neurons decreases pain during phase 2 of the formalin test.

J A McRoberts, H S Ennes, J C G Marvizón, M S Fanselow, E A Mayer, B Vissel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glial cells in neuropathic pain.Physiological reviews · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Advances and Barriers in Understanding PresynapticFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Calcineurin Inhibition Causes α2δ-1-Mediated Tonic Activation of Synaptic NMDA Receptors and Pain Hypersensitivity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Antinociceptive Activity ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

J A McRobertsCenter for Neurobiology of Stress, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. mcrobert@ucla.edu
H S Ennes
J C G Marvizón
M S Fanselow
E A Mayer
B Vissel
University of California, Los Angeles · USGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

Women's Health and Functional Visceral Disorders CenterP50DK064539 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MAYER, EMERAN A · 2002 to 2017
$17.5M
Peripheral NMDA Receptors in Visceral NociceptionR01DK058173 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MCROBERTS, JAMES A · 2001 to 2009
$2.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS 1 P50 DK64539NIDDK NIH HHS DK 58173NIDDK NIH HHS P50 DK064539NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058173
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of NMDA receptors (NMDARs) expressed by primary afferent neurons in nociception remains controversial. The aim of this study was to develop mice with a tissue selective knockdown of NMDARs in these neurons and to evaluate their behavioral responses to different types of painful stimuli. Mice with floxed NMDAR NR1 subunit gene (fNR1) were crossed with mice expressing Cre recombinase under the control of the peripherin promotor (Prph-Cre). Male Prph-Cre+ floxed NR1 mice were compared to Cre- littermates. Both quantitative RT/PCR and Western blotting indicated a ∼75% reduction in NR1 expression in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) extracts with no effect on NR1 expression in spinal cord, brain or the enteric nervous system. Immunocytochemistry with antibodies to NR1 revealed decreased staining in all size classes of DRG neurons. NMDA produced a detectable increase in [Ca2+]i in 60% of DRG neurons cultured from Cre- mice, but only 15% of those from Cre+ mice. Furthermore, the peak [Ca2+]i responses were 64% lower in neurons from Cre+ mice. There was no significant difference between Cre+ and Cre- mice in response latencies to the hotplate or tail withdrawal tests of thermal nociception, nor was there a difference in withdrawal thresholds to mechanical stimuli of the tail or paw. However, compared to Cre- littermates, Cre+ knockdown mice had a 50% decrease in the phase 2 response to formalin injection (P<0.001). There was no effect on phase 1 responses. These results suggest that NMDA receptors expressed by primary afferent nerves play an important role in the development of sensitized pain states.

Indexed as

Afferent PathwaysAnimalsCells, CulturedDisease Models, AnimalDown-RegulationFemaleGanglia, SpinalMaleMiceMice, TransgenicNociceptorsPainPain MeasurementReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSensory Receptor CellsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID20974228
PMCPMC3010451
OpenAlexW1995610095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.