Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20974176›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2011

Using the self-administration of apomorphine and cocaine to measure the pharmacodynamic potencies and pharmacokinetics of competitive dopamine receptor antagonists.

Andrew B Norman, Michael R Tabet, Mantana K Norman, Vladimir L Tsibulsky

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Dopamine and Stress System Modulation of Sex Differences in Decision Making.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew B NormanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati, College of Medicine, 231 Albert Sabin Way, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA. andrew.norman@uc.edu
Michael R Tabet
Mantana K Norman
Vladimir L Tsibulsky
University of Cincinnati Medical Center · USSabin Vaccine Institute · US

Funding

A Human Antibody as an Immunotherapy for Cocaine Abuse (DP1)DP1DA031386 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI NORMAN, ANDREW B · 2010 to 2014
$3.8M
A Human Antibody as an Immunotherapy for Cocaine AbuseR44DA018538 · NIDA · PHASE 2 DISCOVERY, INC. · PI NORMAN, ANDREW B · 2004 to 2009
$3.0M
NIDA NIH HHS DA018538NIDA NIH HHS DP1 DA031386NIDA NIH HHS R44 DA018538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Competitive dopamine receptor antagonists accelerate psychomotor stimulant self-administration. According to pharmacological theory of competitive antagonism antagonists raise the equiactive agonist concentration. In the self-administration paradigm this is assumed to be the satiety threshold or C(min). The magnitude of the proportional increase in satiety threshold (agonist concentration ratio) as a function of antagonist dose should reflect the antagonist pharmacodynamic potency. The time course of this effect should reflect the rate of change of antagonist occupancy of receptors and, therefore, antagonist concentration, i.e. pharmacokinetics. Rats self-administered apomorphine or cocaine at a stable rate and were then injected i.v. with one of four competitive D₁-like or D₂-like dopamine receptor antagonists and the session continued. The agonist concentrations at the time of each self-administration (satiety thresholds) were calculated during the session. The antagonists accelerated self-administration of both agonists with a concomitant increase in the calculated satiety thresholds. The maximum agonist concentration ratio was proportional to the dose of antagonist. The time courses of the changes in agonist concentration ratio were independent of the agonist and of the dose of antagonist. Schild analysis of the maximum agonist concentration ratio as a function of the antagonist dose allowed apparent pA₂ (or K(dose)) to be measured. Antagonist K(dose) values should provide a quantitative basis for receptor identification in behavioral pharmacology. The assay system may also measure the pharmacokinetics of antagonist elimination from the brain. Agonist self-administration represents a sensitive in vivo pharmacological assay system that provides information useful for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of antagonist effects.

Indexed as

AnimalsApomorphineBehavior, AnimalCocaineConditioning, OperantDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsDopamine Uptake InhibitorsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug InteractionsMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationTime FactorsApomorphineCocaineDopamine AgonistsDopamine AntagonistsDopamine Uptake Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID20974176
PMCPMC3017394
OpenAlexW2060173794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.