ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2011
Using the self-administration of apomorphine and cocaine to measure the pharmacodynamic potencies and pharmacokinetics of competitive dopamine receptor antagonists.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using cocaine and apomorphine self-administration in rats to measure the pharmacokinetics of competitive dopamine receptor antagonists administered by different routes.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- SCH23390 and a humanized anti-cocaine mAb decrease the latency to cocaine-induced reinstatement of lever pressing behavior in rats that self-administer cocaine.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Differential effects of acute and chronic antagonist and an irreversible antagonist treatment on cocaine self-administration behavior in rats.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Dopamine and Stress System Modulation of Sex Differences in Decision Making.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018Article
- Maintained cocaine self-administration is determined by quantal responses: implications for the measurement of antagonist potency.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2014Article
- The dopamine D2 antagonist eticlopride accelerates extinction and delays reacquisition of food self-administration in rats.Behavioural pharmacology · 2013Article
- The affinity of D2-like dopamine receptor antagonists determines the time to maximal effect on cocaine self-administration.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2011Article
- Enzyme-therapy approaches for the treatment of drug overdose and addiction.Future medicinal chemistry · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Competitive dopamine receptor antagonists accelerate psychomotor stimulant self-administration. According to pharmacological theory of competitive antagonism antagonists raise the equiactive agonist concentration. In the self-administration paradigm this is assumed to be the satiety threshold or C(min). The magnitude of the proportional increase in satiety threshold (agonist concentration ratio) as a function of antagonist dose should reflect the antagonist pharmacodynamic potency. The time course of this effect should reflect the rate of change of antagonist occupancy of receptors and, therefore, antagonist concentration, i.e. pharmacokinetics. Rats self-administered apomorphine or cocaine at a stable rate and were then injected i.v. with one of four competitive D₁-like or D₂-like dopamine receptor antagonists and the session continued. The agonist concentrations at the time of each self-administration (satiety thresholds) were calculated during the session. The antagonists accelerated self-administration of both agonists with a concomitant increase in the calculated satiety thresholds. The maximum agonist concentration ratio was proportional to the dose of antagonist. The time courses of the changes in agonist concentration ratio were independent of the agonist and of the dose of antagonist. Schild analysis of the maximum agonist concentration ratio as a function of the antagonist dose allowed apparent pA₂ (or K(dose)) to be measured. Antagonist K(dose) values should provide a quantitative basis for receptor identification in behavioral pharmacology. The assay system may also measure the pharmacokinetics of antagonist elimination from the brain. Agonist self-administration represents a sensitive in vivo pharmacological assay system that provides information useful for pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of antagonist effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.