Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20973609›Full record

ArticlePsychology and aging2011

Effects of repetition on associative recognition in young and older adults: item and associative strengthening.

Norbou G Buchler, Paige Faunce, Leah L Light, Nisha Gottfredson, Lynne M Reder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology and aging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Unconscious relational inference recruits the hippocampus.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Norbou G BuchlerDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, and US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD 21005, USA.
Paige Faunce
Leah L Light
Nisha Gottfredson
Lynne M Reder

Funding

COMPUTATIONAL &BEHAVIORAL APPROACHES TO COGNITIONT32MH019983 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI REDER, LYNNE MARIE · 1998 to 2012
$2.6M
EXPLORING THE SAC MODEL OF MEMORYR01MH052808 · NIMH · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI REDER, LYNNE MARIE · 1996 to 2008
$1.5M
NIMH NIH HHS 5T32-MH019983-07NIMH NIH HHS MH052808-08NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH052808NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH019983PHS HHS AGO 2452
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Young and older adults studied word pairs and later discriminated studied pairs from various types of foils including recombined word-pairs and foil pairs containing one or two previously unstudied words. We manipulated how many times a specific word pair was repeated (1 or 5) and how many different words were associated with a given word (1 or 5) to tease apart the effects of item familiarity from recollection of the association. Rather than making simple old/new judgments, subjects chose one of five responses: (a) Old-Old (original), (b) Old-Old (rearranged), (c) Old-New, (d) New-Old, (e) New-New. Veridical recollection was impaired in old age in all memory conditions. There was evidence for a higher rate of false recollection of rearranged pairs following exact repetition of study pairs in older but not younger adults. In contrast, older adults were not more susceptible to interference than young adults when one or both words of the pair had multiple competing associates. Older adults were just as able as young adults to use item familiarity to recognize which word of a foil was old. This pattern suggests that recollection problems in advanced age are because of a deficit in older adults' formation or retrieval of new associations in memory. A modeling simulation provided good fits to these data and offers a mechanistic explanation based on an age-related reduction of working memory.

Indexed as

Association LearningRecognition, PsychologyAdolescentAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansJudgmentMaleMental RecallModels, PsychologicalNeuropsychological TestsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID20973609
PMCPMC3046221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.