Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20972990›Full record

ArticleElectrophoresis2010

Free-solution interaction assay of carbonic anhydrase to its inhibitors using back-scattering interferometry.

Ereny F Morcos, Amanda Kussrow, Carolyn Enders, Darryl Bornhop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Electrophoresis, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Therapeutic Delivery of HJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ereny F MorcosDepartment of Chemistry and Vanderbilt Institute of Chemical Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Amanda Kussrow
Carolyn Enders
Darryl Bornhop

Funding

Chemistry-Biology Interface Training GrantT32GM065086 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BACHMANN, BRIAN O, SULIKOWSKI, GARY ALLEN · 2002 to 2022
$7.0M
Interferometric Nano-sensing for Biochemical AnalysisR01EB003537 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BORNHOP, DARRYL J. · 2005 to 2008
$891k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB003537NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM065086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Back-scattering interferometry (BSI) is a label-free, free-solution, small-volume technique used for characterizing binding interactions, which is also relevant to a growing number of biosensing applications including drug discovery. Here, we use BSI to characterize the interaction of carbonic anhydrase enzyme II with five well-known carbonic anhydrase enzyme II inhibitors (± sulpiride, sulfanilamide, benzene sulfonamide, dansylamide, and acetazolamide) in the presence of DMSO. Dissociation constants calculated for each interaction were consistent with literature values previously obtained using surface plasmon resonance and fluorescence-based competition assays. Results demonstrate the potential of BSI as a drug-screening tool which is fully compatible with DMSO and does not require immobilization or labeling, therefore allowing binding interactions to be characterized in the native state. BSI has the potential for reducing labor costs, sample consumption, and assay time while providing enhanced reliability over existing techniques.

Indexed as

AcetazolamideBiosensing TechniquesCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsCarbonic AnhydrasesDansyl CompoundsDimethyl SulfoxideInterferometryProtein BindingScattering, RadiationSulfanilamides5-dimethylaminonaphthalene-1-sulfonamideAcetazolamideCarbonic Anhydrase InhibitorsCarbonic AnhydrasesDansyl CompoundsDimethyl SulfoxideSulfanilamides

Identifiers

PMID20972990
PMCPMC3997304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.