GuidelineThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2011
Assessment of acute myocardial infarction: current status and recommendations from the North American society for Cardiovascular Imaging and the European Society of Cardiac Radiology.
Guideline in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Myocarditis in Relation to Angiographic Findings in Patients With Provisional Diagnoses of MINOCA.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2020Pooled it
- Gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance: administered dose in relationship to United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidelines.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2012Pooled it
- MAG-PSIR mismatch in a patient with multi-territory myocardial infarcts with and without acute ischemic edema.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Article
- Ensemble learning of myocardial displacements for myocardial infarction detection in echocardiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Prognostic Value of Cortisol Index of Endobiogeny in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Article
- Generalist practitioners' self-rating and competence in electrocardiogram interpretation in South Africa.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2020Article
- Hybrid cardiac imaging using PET/MRI: a joint position statement by the European Society of Cardiovascular Radiology (ESCR) and the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM).European radiology · 2018Review
- Imaging the myocardial ischemic cascade.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2018Review
- Plasmonic DNA hotspots made from tungsten disulfide nanosheets and gold nanoparticles for ultrasensitive aptamer-based SERS detection of myoglobin.Mikrochimica acta · 2018Article
- Protective effect and mechanism of estrogen receptor β on myocardial infarction in mice.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- Myocardial Viability on Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2017Review
- Electrochemical Aptasensor for Myoglobin-Specific Recognition Based on Porphyrin Functionalized Graphene-Conjugated Gold Nanocomposites.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016Article
- Myocardial Infarct Segmentation From Magnetic Resonance Images for Personalized Modeling of Cardiac Electrophysiology.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2016Article
- Relationship of T2-Weighted MRI Myocardial Hyperintensity and the Ischemic Area-At-Risk.Circulation research · 2015Article
- Performance of CMR Methods for Differentiating Acute From Chronic MI.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2015Article
- Non-linear blending of dual-energy CT data improves depiction of late iodine enhancement in chronic myocardial infarction.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2014Article
- Third universal definition of myocardial infarction.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2012Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
There are a number of imaging tests that are used in the setting of acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome. Each has their strengths and limitations. Experts from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging together with other prominent imagers reviewed the literature. It is clear that there is a definite role for imaging in these patients. While comparative accuracy, convenience and cost have largely guided test decisions in the past, the introduction of newer tests is being held to a higher standard which compares patient outcomes. Multicenter randomized comparative effectiveness trials with outcome measures are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.