Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20971876›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Ecophysiology of Fe-cycling bacteria in acidic sediments.

Shipeng Lu, Stefan Gischkat, Marco Reiche, Denise M Akob, Kevin B Hallberg, Kirsten Küsel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Coexistence of FeFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Effects of MixedMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhancement Mechanism of Stibnite Dissolution Mediated byInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Draft Genome Sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Legume-microbiome interactions unlock mineral nutrients in regrowing tropical forests.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Ferric Iron Reduction in Extreme Acidophiles.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Review
  18. Mixotrophic Iron-OxidizingApplied and environmental microbiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shipeng LuInstitute of Ecology, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Dornburger Strasse 159, D-07743 Jena, Germany.
Stefan Gischkat
Marco Reiche
Denise M Akob
Kevin B Hallberg
Kirsten Küsel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a combination of cultivation-dependent and -independent methods, this study aimed to elucidate the diversity of microorganisms involved in iron cycling and to resolve their in situ functional links in sediments of an acidic lignite mine lake. Using six different media with pH values ranging from 2.5 to 4.3, 117 isolates were obtained that grouped into 38 different strains, including 27 putative new species with respect to the closest characterized strains. Among the isolated strains, 22 strains were able to oxidize Fe(II), 34 were able to reduce Fe(III) in schwertmannite, the dominant iron oxide in this lake, and 21 could do both. All isolates falling into the Gammaproteobacteria (an unknown Dyella-like genus and Acidithiobacillus-related strains) were obtained from the top acidic sediment zones (pH 2.8). Firmicutes strains (related to Bacillus and Alicyclobacillus) were only isolated from deep, moderately acidic sediment zones (pH 4 to 5). Of the Alphaproteobacteria, Acidocella-related strains were only isolated from acidic zones, whereas Acidiphilium-related strains were isolated from all sediment depths. Bacterial clone libraries generally supported and complemented these patterns. Geobacter-related clone sequences were only obtained from deep sediment zones, and Geobacter-specific quantitative PCR yielded 8 × 10(5) gene copy numbers. Isolates related to the Acidobacterium, Acidocella, and Alicyclobacillus genera and to the unknown Dyella-like genus showed a broad pH tolerance, ranging from 2.5 to 5.0, and preferred schwertmannite to goethite for Fe(III) reduction. This study highlighted the variety of acidophilic microorganisms that are responsible for iron cycling in acidic environments, extending the results of recent laboratory-based studies that showed this trait to be widespread among acidophiles.

Indexed as

BiodiversityAcidsBacteriaCluster AnalysisDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalGeologic SedimentsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationIronMolecular Sequence DataOxidation-ReductionPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNAAcidsDNA, BacterialDNA, RibosomalIronRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID20971876
PMCPMC3008266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.