Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20971875›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2010

Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter isolates from retail meat in the United States between 2002 and 2007.

S Zhao, S R Young, E Tong, J W Abbott, N Womack, S L Friedman, P F McDermott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Antimicrobial resistance profiles ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Aerotolerance and Multi-Locus Sequence Typing ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Circulation of thermophilicFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The Prevalence ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  8. Agents of Campylobacteriosis in Different Meat Matrices in Brazil.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Core Genome MLST for Source Attribution ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Antimicrobial Resistance ofFoodborne pathogens and disease · 2020
    Article
  16. A Review ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S ZhaoDivision of Animal and Food Microbiology, Office of Research, Center for Veterinary Medicine, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Laurel, Maryland 20708, USA. shaohua.zhao@fda.hhs.gov
S R Young
E Tong
J W Abbott
N Womack
S L Friedman
P F McDermott

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of antimicrobial resistance in Campylobacter spp. has been a growing public health concern globally. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence, antimicrobial susceptibility, and genetic relatedness of Campylobacter spp. recovered by the National Antimicrobial Resistance Monitoring System (NARMS) retail meat program. Retail meat samples (n = 24,566) from 10 U.S. states collected between 2002 and 2007, consisting of 6,138 chicken breast, 6,109 ground turkey, 6,171 ground beef, and 6,148 pork chop samples, were analyzed. A total of 2,258 Campylobacter jejuni, 925 Campylobacter coli, and 7 Campylobacter lari isolates were identified. Chicken breast samples showed the highest contamination rate (49.9%), followed by ground turkey (1.6%), whereas both pork chops and ground beef had <0.5% contamination. The most common resistance was to doxycycline/tetracycline (46.6%), followed by nalidixic acid (18.5%), ciprofloxacin (17.4%), azithromycin and erythromycin (2.8%), telithromycin (2.4%), clindamycin (2.2%), and gentamicin (<0.1%). In a subset of isolates tested, no resistance to meropenem and florfenicol was seen. C. coli isolates showed higher resistance rates to antimicrobials, with the exception of doxycycline/tetracycline, than those seen for C. jejuni. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) fingerprinting resulted in 1,226 PFGE profiles among the 2,318 isolates, with many clones being widely dispersed throughout the 6-year sampling period.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCampylobacter coliCampylobacter jejuniCampylobacter lariCattleChickensCluster AnalysisDNA FingerprintingElectrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-FieldGenotypeMeatMolecular TypingSwineTurkeysAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID20971875
PMCPMC3008252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.