Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20971820›Full record

ArticleHaematologica2011

Evaluation of gene expression signatures predictive of cytogenetic and molecular subtypes of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia.

Brian V Balgobind, Marry M Van den Heuvel-Eibrink, Renee X De Menezes, Dirk Reinhardt, Iris H I M Hollink, Susan T J C M Arentsen-Peters, Elisabeth R van Wering, Gertjan J L Kaspers, Jacqueline Cloos, Evelien S J M de Bont and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Haematologica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Brian V BalgobindErasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Department of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, Room Sp2456, PO Box 2060, 3000 CB Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Marry M Van den Heuvel-Eibrink
Renee X De Menezes
Dirk Reinhardt
Iris H I M Hollink
Susan T J C M Arentsen-Peters
Elisabeth R van Wering
Gertjan J L Kaspers
Jacqueline Cloos
Evelien S J M de Bont
Jean-Michel Cayuela
Andre Baruchel
Claus Meyer
Rolf Marschalek
Jan Trka
Jan Stary
H Berna Beverloo
Rob Pieters
C Michel Zwaan
Monique L den Boer
Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital · NLCharles University · CZHôpital Saint-Louis · FRVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLBeatrix Kinderziekenhuis · NLErasmus MC · NLFreiberger Compound Materials (Germany) · DELoyola University Medical Center · USStichting Kinderoncologie Nederland · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPediatric acute myeloid leukemia is a heterogeneous disease characterized by non-random genetic aberrations related to outcome. The genetic subtype is currently detected by different diagnostic procedures which differ in success rate and/or specificity. DESIGN AND

methodsWe examined the potential of gene expression profiles to classify pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Gene expression microarray data of 237 children with acute myeloid leukemia were collected and a double-loop cross validation approach was used to generate a subtype-predictive gene expression profile in the discovery cohort (n=157) which was then tested for its true predictive value in the independent validation cohort (n=80). The classifier consisted of 75 probe sets, representing the top 15 discriminating probe sets for MLL-rearranged, t(8;21)(q22;q22), inv(16)(p13q22), t(15;17)(q21;q22) and t(7;12)(q36;p13)-positive acute myeloid leukemia.

resultsThese cytogenetic subtypes represent approximately 40% of cases of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia and were predicted with 92% and 99% accuracy in the discovery and independent validation cohort, respectively. However, for NPM1, CEBPA, MLL(-PTD), FLT3(-ITD), KIT, PTPN11 and N/K-RAS gene expression signatures had limited predictive value. This may be caused by a limited frequency of these mutations and by underlying cytogenetics. This latter is exemplified by the fact that different gene expression signatures were discovered for FLT3-ITD in patients with normal cytogenetics and in those with t(15;17)(q21;q22)-positive acute myeloid leukemia, which pointed to HOXB-upregulation being specific for FLT3-ITD(+) cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia.

conclusionsIn conclusion, gene expression profiling correctly predicted the most prevalent cytogenetic subtypes of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia with high accuracy. In clinical practice, this gene expression signature may replace multiple diagnostic tests for approximately 40% of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia cases whereas only for the remaining cases (predicted as 'acute myeloid leukemia-other') are additional tests indicated. Moreover, the discriminative genes reveal new insights into the biology of acute myeloid leukemia subtypes that warrants follow-up as potential targets for new therapies.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingAdultBiomarkers, TumorChildCytogenetic AnalysisGene RearrangementHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinNucleophosminOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerBiomarkers, TumorHistone-Lysine N-MethyltransferaseKMT2A protein, humanMyeloid-Lymphoid Leukemia ProteinNPM1 protein, humanNucleophosminRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID20971820
PMCPMC3031689
OpenAlexW2110318292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.