Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20971684›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pharmacology2010

Molecular dynamics simulations of protein dynamics and their relevance to drug discovery.

Freddie R Salsbury

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pharmacology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Computational Analysis ofACS chemical neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Predicting multiple conformations of ligand binding sites in proteins suggests that AlphaFold2 may remember too much.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Leveraging Therapeutic Proteins and Peptides fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Freddie R SalsburyDepartment of Physics, Wake Forest University, 1834 Wake Forest Road, Winston-Salem, NC 27106, USA. salsbufr@wfu.edu

Funding

Targeting the MSH2-dependent Apoptotic PathwayR01CA129373 · NCI · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY · PI SALSBURY, FREDDIE R. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129373
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations have become increasingly useful in studying biological systems of biomedical interest, and not just in the study of model or toy systems. In this article, the methods and principles of all-atom molecular dynamics will be elucidated with several examples provided of their utility to investigators interested on drug discovery.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryMolecular Dynamics SimulationProtein ConformationHumansModels, MolecularProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID20971684
PMCPMC2981647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.