Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20969757›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2010

Copy number variation in the porcine genome inferred from a 60 k SNP BeadChip.

Yuliaxis Ramayo-Caldas, Anna Castelló, Romi N Pena, Estefania Alves, Anna Mercadé, Carla A Souza, Ana I Fernández, Miguel Perez-Enciso, Josep M Folch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Copy Number Variation onMicrobiology spectrum · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Two Different Copy Number Variations of theAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CNV analysis of Meishan pig by next-generation sequencing and effects ofJournal of animal science and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuliaxis Ramayo-CaldasDepartament de Ciència Animal i dels Aliments, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain.
Anna Castelló
Romi N Pena
Estefania Alves
Anna Mercadé
Carla A Souza
Ana I Fernández
Miguel Perez-Enciso
Josep M Folch
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESInstitute for Research and Technology in Food and Agriculture · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent studies in pigs have detected copy number variants (CNVs) using the Comparative Genomic Hybridization technique in arrays designed to cover specific porcine chromosomes. The goal of this study was to identify CNV regions (CNVRs) in swine species based on whole genome SNP genotyping chips.

resultsWe used predictions from three different programs (cnvPartition, PennCNV and GADA) to analyze data from the Porcine SNP60 BeadChip. A total of 49 CNVRs were identified in 55 animals from an Iberian x Landrace cross (IBMAP) according to three criteria: detected in at least two animals, contained three or more consecutive SNPs and recalled by at least two programs. Mendelian inheritance of CNVRs was confirmed in animals belonging to several generations of the IBMAP cross. Subsequently, a segregation analysis of these CNVRs was performed in 372 additional animals from the IBMAP cross and its distribution was studied in 133 unrelated pig samples from different geographical origins. Five out of seven analyzed CNVRs were validated by real time quantitative PCR, some of which coincide with well known examples of CNVs conserved across mammalian species.

conclusionsOur results illustrate the usefulness of Porcine SNP60 BeadChip to detect CNVRs and show that structural variants can not be neglected when studying the genetic variability in this species.

Indexed as

MicrospheresAnimalsCrosses, GeneticDatabases, GeneticDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenomeHumansMaleMolecular Sequence AnnotationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPolymorphism, Single NucleotideReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSoftwareSus scrofa

Identifiers

PMID20969757
PMCPMC3091738
OpenAlexW2042753550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.