Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20969592›Full record

ReviewImmunological reviews2010

αβ versus γδ fate choice: counting the T-cell lineages at the branch point.

Taras Kreslavsky, Michael Gleimer, Annette I Garbe, Harald von Boehmer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Immunological reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The role of T cells in vascular aging, hypertension, and atherosclerosis.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. ILC Differentiation in the Thymus.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Tipping the Scales With Zebrafish to Understand Adaptive Tumor Immunity.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Suppressive activity of Vδ2Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2020
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Zebrafish and Medaka: Two Teleost Models of T-Cell and Thymic Development.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Immune Cell Identity: Perspective from a Palimpsest.Perspectives in biology and medicine · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Taras KreslavskyLaboratory of Lymphocyte Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Michael Gleimer
Annette I Garbe
Harald von Boehmer

Funding

pTa-controlled reporter to identify lymphoid precursorR01AI051378 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI VON BOEHMER, HARALD · 2003 to 2012
$4.1M
ROLE OF THE PRE-T CELL RECEPTOR IN LINEAGE COMMITMENTR01AI045846 · NIAID · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI VON BOEHMER, HARALD · 2000 to 2010
$4.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI045846NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051378PHS HHS R01 A145846PHS HHS R01 A151378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both αβ and γδ T cells develop in the thymus from a common progenitor. Historically distinguished by their T-cell receptor (TCR), these lineages are now defined on the basis of distinct molecular programs. Intriguingly, in many transgenic and knockout systems these programs are mismatched with the TCR type, leading to the development of γδ lineage cells driven by αβTCR and vice versa. These puzzling observations were recently explained by the demonstration that TCR signal strength, rather than TCR type per se, instructs lineage fate, with stronger TCR signal favoring γδ and weaker signal favoring αβ lineage fates. These studies also highlighted the ERK (extracellular signal regulated kinase)-Egr (early growth response)-Id3 (inhibitor of differentiation 3) axis as a potential molecular switch downstream of TCR that determines lineage choice. Indeed, removal of Id3 was sufficient to redirect TCRγδ transgenic cells to the αβ lineage, even in the presence of strong TCR signal. However, in TCR non-transgenic Id3 knockout mice the overall number of γδ lineage cells was increased due to an outgrowth of a Vγ1Vδ6.3 subset, suggesting that not all γδ T cells depend on this molecular switch for lineage commitment. Thus, the γδ lineage may in fact be a collection of two or more lineages not sharing a common molecular program and thus equipollent to the αβ lineage. TCR signaling is not the only factor that is required for development of αβ and γδ lineage cells; other pathways, such as signaling from Notch and CXCR4 receptors, cooperate with the TCR in this process.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageHumansInhibitor of Differentiation ProteinsMiceMice, KnockoutMice, TransgenicProtein BindingReceptor Cross-TalkReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaSignal TransductionT-LymphocytesIdb3 protein, mouseInhibitor of Differentiation ProteinsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta

Identifiers

PMID20969592
PMCPMC3031133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.