ArticleMilitary medicine2010
Military line leadership and tobacco control: perspectives of military policy leaders and tobacco control managers.
Article in Military medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Nobody Views It As a Negative Thing to Smoke": A Qualitative Study of the Relationship Between United States Air Force Culture and Tobacco Use.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021Article
- Perspectives of US military commanders on tobacco use and tobacco control policy.Tobacco control · 2017Article
- Banning cigarette smoking on US Navy submarines: a case study.Tobacco control · 2015Article
- A content analysis of military commander messages about tobacco and other health issues in military installation newspapers: what do military commanders say about tobacco?Military medicine · 2015Article
- Health in the news: an analysis of magazines coverage of health issues in veterans and military service organizations.Military medicine · 2015Article
- "Throwing a rock at their armored tank": civilian authority and military tobacco control.BMC public health · 2014Article
- Cigarette prices in military retail: a review and proposal for advancing military health policy.Military medicine · 2013Review
- Military exceptionalism or tobacco exceptionalism: how civilian health leaders' beliefs may impede military tobacco control efforts.American journal of public health · 2013Article
- Why strong tobacco control measures "can't" be implemented in the U.S. Military: a qualitative analysis.Military medicine · 2012Article
- Menthol cigarette pricing at military and community retail outlets in the United States.BMC public health · 2012Article
- A content analysis of tobacco control policy in the U.S. Department of Defense.Journal of public health policy · 2011Article
- Mediatory myths in the U.S. military: tobacco use as "stress relief".American journal of health promotion : AJHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite progress in policy changes, tobacco use rates are still high in the military. Little is known about the views of those who create and implement tobacco control policies within the Department of Defense. These individuals determine what policy initiatives will be developed, prioritized, and implemented. We conducted key informant interviews with 16 service-level policy leaders (PLs) and 36 installation-level tobacco control managers (TCMs). PLs and TCMs believed that line leadership view tobacco control as a low priority that has minimal impact on successful mission completion. They also identified cultural factors that perpetuate tobacco use, such as low cost and easy accessibility to tobacco, smoke breaks, and uneven or unknown enforcement of current tobacco policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.