Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20967781›Full record

ReviewBioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology2010

Meiotic versus mitotic recombination: two different routes for double-strand break repair: the different functions of meiotic versus mitotic DSB repair are reflected in different pathway usage and different outcomes.

Sabrina L Andersen, Jeff Sekelsky

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Influence of Edaphic Factors on DNA Damage and Repair in Wild WheatInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  7. MRNIP interacts with sex body chromatin to support meiotic progression, spermatogenesis, and male fertility in mice.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Meiotic Crossover Patterning.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Centromere scission drives chromosome shuffling and reproductive isolation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. TheFrontiers in plant science · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. AberrantGenome research · 2018
    Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sabrina L AndersenCurriculum in Genetics and Molecular Biology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Jeff Sekelsky
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Melissa A. Troester · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
Meiotic Recombination in DrosophilaR01GM061252 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SEKELSKY, JEFF J. · 2000 to 2015
$4.1M
Mechanisms of Mitotic RecombinationR01GM088606 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SEKELSKY, JEFF J. · 2009 to 2010
$529k
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061252NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM061252NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088606NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM088606
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have validated the major features of the double-strand break repair (DSBR) model as an accurate representation of the pathway through which meiotic crossovers (COs) are produced. This success has led to this model being invoked to explain double-strand break (DSB) repair in other contexts. However, most non-crossover (NCO) recombinants generated during S. cerevisiae meiosis do not arise via a DSBR pathway. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly clear that DSBR is a minor pathway for recombinational repair of DSBs that occur in mitotically-proliferating cells and that the synthesis-dependent strand annealing (SDSA) model appears to describe mitotic DSB repair more accurately. Fundamental dissimilarities between meiotic and mitotic recombination are not unexpected, since meiotic recombination serves a very different purpose (accurate chromosome segregation, which requires COs) than mitotic recombination (repair of DNA damage, which typically generates NCOs).

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedRecombination, GeneticChromosome SegregationCrossing Over, GeneticDNA DamageDNA RepairMeiosisMitosisMutationSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID20967781
PMCPMC3090628
OpenAlexW1985112184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.