Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20967540›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2011

Hepatobiliary and pancreatic imaging in children-techniques and an overview of non-neoplastic disease entities.

Rutger A J Nievelstein, Simon G F Robben, Johan G Blickman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Neonatal Cholestasis: A Pandora's Box.Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics · 2018
    Review
  7. MRI of paediatric liver tumours: How we review and report.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2016
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Neonatal Cholestasis.NeoReviews · 2013
    Article
  12. Definitions of pediatric pancreatitis and survey of present clinical practices.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rutger A J NievelsteinDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. R.A.J.Nievelstein@umcutrecht.nl
Simon G F Robben
Johan G Blickman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging plays a major role in the diagnostic work-up of children with hepatobiliary or pancreatic diseases. It consists mainly of US, CT and MRI, with US and MRI being the preferred imaging modalities because of the lack of ionizing radiation. In this review the technique of US, CT and MRI in children will be addressed, followed by a comprehensive overview of the imaging characteristics of several hepatobiliary and pancreatic disease entities most common in the paediatric age group.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingChildHumansLiver DiseasesMagnetic Resonance ImagingPancreatic DiseasesTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID20967540
PMCPMC3016234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.