Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20967484›Full record

Trial reportInvestigational new drugs2012

A phase II study of cell cycle inhibitor UCN-01 in patients with metastatic melanoma: a California Cancer Consortium trial.

Tianhong Li, Scott D Christensen, Paul H Frankel, Kim A Margolin, Sanjiv S Agarwala, Thehang Luu, Philip C Mack, Primo N Lara, David R Gandara

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Investigational new drugs, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. UCN-SiORSC advances · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. ATR/CHK1 inhibitors and cancer therapy.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2018
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cell cycle checkpoint in cancer: a therapeutically targetable double-edged sword.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2016
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Exploiting replicative stress to treat cancer.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2015
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tianhong LiDivision of Hematology & Oncology, University of California Davis Cancer Center, 4501 X Street, Suite 3016, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA. tianhong.li@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu
Scott D Christensen
Paul H Frankel
Kim A Margolin
Sanjiv S Agarwala
Thehang Luu
Philip C Mack
Primo N Lara
David R Gandara
University of California, Davis · USCity of Hope · USUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · US

Funding

Staff InvestigatorsP30CA093373 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI Laura Marcu · 2002 to 2026
$84.9M
UC DAVIS CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE CENTER: BPCAUL1RR024146 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BERGLUND, LARS F · 2006 to 2011
$27.0M
NCI NIH HHS N01 CM062209NCI NIH HHS P30 CA093373NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenetic abnormalities in cell cycle control are common in malignant melanoma. UCN-01 (7-hydroxystaurosporine) is an investigational agent that exhibits antitumor activity by perturbing the cancer cell cycle. A patient with advanced melanoma experienced a partial response in a phase I trial of single agent UCN-01. We sought to determine the activity of UCN-01 against refractory metastatic melanoma in a phase II study. Patients and methods Patients with advanced melanoma received UCN-01 at 90 mg/m(2) over 3 h on cycle 1, reduced to 45 mg/m(2) over 3 h for subsequent cycles, every 21 days. Primary endpoint was tumor response. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A two-stage (17 + 16), single arm phase II design was employed. A true response rate of ≥ 20% (i.e., at least one responder in the first stage, or at least four responders overall) was to be considered promising for further development of UCN-01 in this setting. Results Seventeen patients were accrued in the first stage. One patient was inevaluable for response. Four (24%) patients had stable disease, and 12 (71%) had disease progression. As there were no responders in the first stage, the study was closed to further accrual. Median PFS was 1.3 months (95% CI, 1.2-3.0) while median OS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 3.4-18.4). One-year and two year OS rates were 41% and 12%, respectively. A median of two cycles were delivered (range, 1-18). Grade 3 treatment-related toxicities include hyperglycemia (N = 2), fatigue (N = 1), and diarrhea (N = 1). One patient experienced grade 4 creatinine elevation and grade 4 anemia possibly due to UCN-01. No dose modification was required as these patients had disease progression. Conclusion Although well tolerated, UCN-01 as a single agent did not have sufficient clinical activity to warrant further study in refractory melanoma.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCaliforniaCell CycleDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansInfusions, IntravenousKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMelanomaMiddle Aged7-hydroxystaurosporineAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase CProtein Kinase InhibitorsStaurosporine

Identifiers

PMID20967484
PMCPMC3277821
OpenAlexW2149590746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.