Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20967469›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biometeorology2012

Balneoprevention: new approaches.

Csaba Varga

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biometeorology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. To treat or not to treat? Misbeliefs in spa water disinfection.International journal of biometeorology · 2019
    Article
  9. Sulphurous Mineral Waters: New Applications for Health.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Review
  10. On the proper study design applicable to experimental balneology.International journal of biometeorology · 2016
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Balneology paradox.International journal of biometeorology · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Csaba VargaDepartment of Environmental Health, Institute of Public Health Medicine, University of Pécs, Szigeti 12, Pécs, 7624, Hungary. chemsafety@freemail.hu
University of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study outlines a strategy for studying application of balneotreatment in preventive medicine (balneoprevention). Prophylactic use of spa treatment and mineral water consumption can be studied using epidemiological methods in the involved population. Calculated toxicological risk of balneological treatment can be decreased by performing a complete chemical analysis (including high performance organic analyses) and specific toxicity tests of medicinal water and mud (peloid) samples.

Indexed as

BalneologyHumansMineral WatersRisk AssessmentToxicity TestsMineral Waters

Identifiers

PMID20967469
OpenAlexW2047628605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.