Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20967340›Full record

ReviewPhotochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology2010

What site-directed labeling studies tell us about the mechanism of rhodopsin activation and G-protein binding.

David L Farrens

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Photochemical & photobiological sciences : Official journal of the European Photochemistry Association and the European Society for Photobiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Decay of an active GPCR: Conformational dynamics govern agonist rebinding and persistence of an active, yet empty, receptor state.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Entropic tension in crowded membranes.PLoS computational biology · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

David L FarrensDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon 97239, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Structural Dynamics of Retinal Binding and ReleaseR01EY015436 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FARRENS, DAVID L · 2006 to 2014
$2.6M
Purification &Structural Analysis/Cannabinoid ReceptorR01DA018169 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FARRENS, DAVID L · 2004 to 2007
$906k
NEI NIH HHS EY015436NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015436NIDA NIH HHS DA018169NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA018169
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhodopsin is the photoreceptor protein responsible for dim-light vision in mammals. Due to extensive biophysical, structural and computational analysis of this membrane protein, it is presently the best understood G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). Here I briefly review one approach that has been extensively used to identify dynamic and structural changes in rhodopsin--the use of site-directed labeling methods (SDL) coupled with electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and fluorescence spectroscopy. These SDL studies involve introducing individual cysteine residues into the receptor, then labeling them with cysteine-reactive probes for subsequent analysis by the appropriate spectroscopy. I will give a brief overview of how SDL methods are carried out and how the data is analyzed. Then, I will discuss how SDL studies were carried out on rhodopsin, and how they were used to identify a key structural change that occurs in rhodopsin upon activation--movement of transmembrane helix 6 (TM6). I will also briefly discuss how the SDL studies of rhodopsin compare with SDL studies of other GPCRs, and compare the SDL data with early and recent crystal structures of rhodopsin. Finally, I will discuss why the TM6 movement is required for rhodopsin to couple with the G-protein transducin, and speculate how this mechanism might be a universal method used by all GPCRs to bind G-proteins and perhaps other proteins involved in visual signal transduction, such as arrestin and rhodopsin kinase.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyGTP-Binding ProteinsHumansModels, MolecularProtein BindingProtein ConformationRhodopsinSpectrometry, FluorescenceGTP-Binding ProteinsRhodopsin

Identifiers

PMID20967340
PMCPMC3901699
OpenAlexW2021192083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.