ReviewPLoS medicine2010
Being more realistic about the public health impact of genomic medicine.
Review in PLoS medicine, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Risk Prediction Models for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2016Pooled it
- Onasemnogene abeparvovec for presymptomatic infants with three copies of SMN2 at risk for spinal muscular atrophy: the Phase III SPR1NT trial.Nature medicine · 2022Trial
- Evaluating Approaches for Communication About Genomic Influences on Body Weight.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2015Trial
- Governing Personalized Health: A Scoping Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Molecular and genomic sciences in health: apply the established rules of evidence.International journal of public health · 2016Article
- Pragmatic medicine in solid cancer: a translational alternative to precision medicine.OncoTargets and therapy · 2016Article
- Genetic and Environmental Interplay in Adolescent Substance Use Disorders.Current addiction reports · 2015Article
- Perceptions of genetic testing and genomic medicine among drug users.The International journal on drug policy · 2015Article
- Pharmacogenetic approaches in the treatment of alcohol use disorders: addressing clinical utility and implementation thresholds.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2014Review
- Reflections on the cost of "low-cost" whole genome sequencing: framing the health policy debate.PLoS biology · 2013Article
- Application of PHEL - 'Public Health Epidemiological Logic' of Public Health Intervention and Public Health Impact.International journal of preventive medicine · 2013Article
- Enhancing Children against Unhealthy Behaviors-An Ethical and Policy Assessment of Using a Nicotine Vaccine.Public health ethics · 2013Article
- Do we know enough? A scientific and ethical analysis of the basis for genetic-based personalized nutrition.Genes & nutrition · 2013Article
- Harm, hype and evidence: ELSI research and policy guidance.Genome medicine · 2013Article
- Beyond base pairs to bedside: a population perspective on how genomics can improve health.American journal of public health · 2012Article
- Personalized medicine: caught between hope, hype and the real world.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2012Review
- Comparison of family history and SNPs for predicting risk of complex disease.PLoS genetics · 2012Article
- Biobanking and public health: is a human rights approach the tie that binds?Human genetics · 2011Article
- Direct-to-consumer testing: if consumers are not anxious, why are policymakers?Human genetics · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.