Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20966100›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2010

Nonrandom survival of gene conversions among yeast ribosomal proteins duplicated through genome doubling.

Annette M Evangelisti, Gavin C Conant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. RiboScreenBiomedicines · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. POInTBMC bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Yeast Crf1p: An activator in need is an activator indeed.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  11. BMC bioinformatics · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Annette M EvangelistiDepartment of Biology, University of New Mexico, NM, USA.
Gavin C Conant
University of Missouri · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By comparing the patterns of evolution in the coding and upstream noncoding regions of yeast ribosomal protein (RP) genes duplicated in a genome duplication, we find that although nonsynonymous sites in the coding sequences show strong evidence for the fixation of recent gene conversion events, similar patterns are less evident among the synonymous positions and noncoding regulatory elements. This result suggests a potential explanation for the somewhat puzzling fact that duplicated RP genes are not functionally redundant despite their very high protein sequence identity. An analysis of the patterns of regulatory network evolution after genome duplication also indicates that the duplicated proteins have diverged considerably in expression despite their similar protein sequences.

Indexed as

Gene ConversionGene DuplicationGene ExpressionGene Expression ProfilingGenome, FungalOpen Reading FramesRibosomal ProteinsSaccharomycesRibosomal Proteins

Identifiers

PMID20966100
PMCPMC2988524
OpenAlexW2104308520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.