Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20966043›Full record

ArticleDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals2011

Identification of clinically used drugs that activate pregnane X receptors.

Sunita J Shukla, Srilatha Sakamuru, Ruili Huang, Timothy A Moeller, Paul Shinn, Danielle Vanleer, Douglas S Auld, Christopher P Austin, Menghang Xia

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Identification of PXR Activators fromDrug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Pregnane X Receptor and the Gut-Liver Axis: A Recent Update.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Identifying CAR Modulators Utilizing a Reporter Gene Assay.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Targeting Xenobiotic Nuclear Receptors PXR and CAR to Prevent Cobicistat Hepatotoxicity.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. 100 Years of Suramin.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sunita J ShuklaNational Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Srilatha Sakamuru
Ruili Huang
Timothy A Moeller
Paul Shinn
Danielle Vanleer
Douglas S Auld
Christopher P Austin
Menghang Xia
National Institutes of Health · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · US

Funding

NIH Chemical Genomics CenterZIBHG200319 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI AUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER P · 2010 to 2011
$55.9M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pregnane X receptor (PXR) binds xenobiotics and regulates the expression of several drug-metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Human PXR (hPXR) activation and CYP3A4 induction can be involved in drug-drug interactions, resulting in reduced efficacy or increased toxicity. However, there are known species-specific differences with regard to PXR activation that should be taken into account when animal PXR data are extrapolated to humans. We profiled 2816 clinically used drugs from the National Institutes of Health Chemical Genomics Center Pharmaceutical Collection for their ability to activate hPXR and rat PXR (rPXR) at the cellular level, induce human CYP3A4 at the cellular level, and bind human PXR at the protein level. From 6 to 11% of drugs were identified as active across the four assays, which included assay-specific and pan-active compounds. The lowest concordance was observed between the hPXR and rPXR assays, and many compounds active in both assays nonetheless demonstrated significant potency differences between species. Analysis based on clustering potency values demonstrated the greatest activity correlation between the hPXR activation and CYP3A4 induction assays. Structure-activity relationship analysis identified chemical scaffolds that were pan-active (e.g., dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers) and others that were uniquely active in individual assays (e.g., steroids and fatty acids). These results provide important information on PXR activation by clinically used drugs, highlight the species specificity of PXR activation by xenobiotics, and provide a means of prioritizing compounds for follow-up studies and optimization efforts.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Line, TumorCytochrome P-450 CYP3ADrug InteractionsHepatocytesHep G2 CellsHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPregnane X ReceptorRatsReceptors, SteroidSmall Molecule LibrariesSpecies SpecificityStructure-Activity RelationshipXenobioticsCYP3A4 protein, humanCytochrome P-450 CYP3APharmaceutical PreparationsPregnane X ReceptorReceptors, SteroidSmall Molecule LibrariesXenobiotics

Identifiers

PMID20966043
PMCPMC3014269
OpenAlexW2122152061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.