Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20965415›Full record

ReviewMolecular cell2010

The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.

Alberto Ciccia, Stephen J Elledge

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular cell, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2,659 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2,659citing papers in PubMed
80.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2,659 citing papers in PubMed, 4,258 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

2,599 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alberto CicciaHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Stephen J Elledge
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Genetics of Cell Cycle &DNA Damage Regulation in YeastR37GM044664 · NIGMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI ELLEDGE, STEPHEN J · 2003 to 2012
$3.5M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM044664
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage to our genetic material is an ongoing threat to both our ability to faithfully transmit genetic information to our offspring as well as our own survival. To respond to these threats, eukaryotes have evolved the DNA damage response (DDR). The DDR is a complex signal transduction pathway that has the ability to sense DNA damage and transduce this information to the cell to influence cellular responses to DNA damage. Cells possess an arsenal of enzymatic tools capable of remodeling and repairing DNA; however, their activities must be tightly regulated in a temporal, spatial, and DNA lesion-appropriate fashion to optimize repair and prevent unnecessary and potentially deleterious alterations in the structure of DNA during normal cellular processes. This review will focus on how the DDR controls DNA repair and the phenotypic consequences of defects in these critical regulatory functions in mammals.

Indexed as

DNA DamageAnimalsDNADNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA RepairEukaryotaModels, GeneticRecombination, GeneticSignal TransductionDNA

Identifiers

PMID20965415
PMCPMC2988877
OpenAlexW2077436902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.