Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20964822›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2010

Mapping the cellular and molecular heterogeneity of normal and malignant breast tissues and cultured cell lines.

Patrica J Keller, Amy F Lin, Lisa M Arendt, Ina Klebba, Ainsely D Jones, Jenny A Rudnick, Theresa A DiMeo, Hannah Gilmore, Douglas M Jefferson, Roger A Graham and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Patrica J KellerDepartment of Anatomy & Cellular Biology, Sackler School, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Amy F Lin
Lisa M Arendt
Ina Klebba
Ainsely D Jones
Jenny A Rudnick
Theresa A DiMeo
Hannah Gilmore
Douglas M Jefferson
Roger A Graham
Stephen P Naber
Stuart Schnitt
Charlotte Kuperwasser
Tufts Medical Center · USTufts University · USHarvard University · USMolecular Oncology (United States) · US

Funding

Mechanisms of estrogen action on bone marrow-derived stem stromal cellsR01CA125554 · NCI · TUFTS UNIVERSITY BOSTON · PI KUPERWASSER, CHARLOTTE · 2007 to 2011
$1.5M
Interactions of PRL, Estrogen, and TFFa in Mammary CancerK01RR021858 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI ARENDT, LISA M · 2006 to 2010
$564k
NCI NIH HHS R01CA125554NCRR NIH HHS K01-RR021858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNormal and neoplastic breast tissues are comprised of heterogeneous populations of epithelial cells involving various degrees of maturation and differentiation. While cultured cell lines have been derived from both normal and malignant tissues, it remains unclear whether they retain a similar cellular heterogeneity as to that found within breast tissues.

methodsWe used 12 reduction mammoplasty tissues, 15 primary breast cancer tissues, and 20 human breast epithelial cell lines (16 cancer lines, 4 normal lines) to perform flow cytometry for CD44, CD24, epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), and CD49f expression as well as immunohistochemistry, and in vivo tumor xenograft formation studies to extensively analyze the molecular and cellular characteristics of breast epithelial cell lineages.

resultsHuman breast tissues contain four distinguishable epithelial differentiation states (two luminal phenotypes and two basal phenotypes) that differ on the basis of CD24, EpCAM and CD49f expression. Primary human breast cancer tissues also contain these four cellular states, but in altered proportions compared to normal tissues. In contrast, cultured cancer cell lines are enriched for rare basal and mesenchymal phenotypes, which are normally present in small numbers within human tissues. Similarly, cultured normal human mammary epithelial cell lines were enriched for rare basal and mesenchymal phenotypes that represent a minor fraction of cells within reduction mammoplasty tissues. Although normal human mammary epithelial cell lines exhibited features of bi-potent progenitor cells they were unable to differentiate into mature luminal breast epithelial cells.

conclusionsAs a group breast cancer cell lines represent the heterogeneity of human breast tumors, but individually they exhibit increased lineage-restricted profiles that fall short of truly representing the intratumoral heterogeneity of individual breast tumors. Additionally, normal human mammary epithelial cell lines fail to retain much of the cellular diversity found in human breast tissues and are enriched for differentiation states that are a minority in breast tissues, although they do exhibit features of bi-potent basal progenitor cells. These findings suggest that collections of cell lines representing multiple cell types can be used to model the cellular heterogeneity of tissues.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorBreastBreast NeoplasmsCD24 AntigenCell Adhesion MoleculesCell DifferentiationCell Line, TumorEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeEpithelial CellsFemaleGene ExpressionHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsIntegrin alpha6Antigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCell Adhesion MoleculesEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeHyaluronan ReceptorsIntegrin alpha6

Identifiers

PMID20964822
PMCPMC3096980
OpenAlexW2117712528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.