Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20964470›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of managed care2010

Variation in prescription use and spending for lipid-lowering and diabetes medications in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System.

Walid F Gellad, Chester B Good, John C Lowe, Julie M Donohue

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of managed care, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Role of pharmacy services in accountable care organizations.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2015
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Sources of regional variation in Medicare Part D drug spending.The New England journal of medicine · 2012
    Article
  10. Health care for patients with serious mental illness: family medicine's role.Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFM
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Walid F GelladCenter for Health Equity Research and Promotion, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15206, USA. walid.gellad@va.gov
Chester B Good
John C Lowe
Julie M Donohue

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2RR024154 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$22.2M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstitutionKL2TR000146 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000146NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR024154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo examine variation in outpatient prescription use and spending for hyperlipidemia and diabetes mellitus in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System (VA) and its association with quality measures for these conditions. STUDY

designCross-sectional.

methodsWe compared outpatient prescription use, spending, and quality of care across 135 VA medical centers (VAMCs) in fiscal year 2008, including 2.3 million patients dispensed lipid-lowering medications and 981,031 patients dispensed diabetes medications. At each facility, we calculated VAMC-level cost per patient for these medications, the proportion of patients taking brand-name drugs, and Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) scores for hyperlipidemia (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level <100 mg/dL) and for diabetes (glycosylated hemoglobin level >9% or not measured).

resultsThe median cost per patient for lipid-lowering agents in fiscal year 2008 was $49.60 and varied from $39.68 in the least expensive quartile of VAMCs to $69.57 in the most expensive quartile (P < .001). For diabetes agents, the median cost per patient was $158.34 and varied from $123.34 in the least expensive quartile to $198.31 in the most expensive quartile (P < .001). The proportion of patients dispensed brand-name oral drugs among these classes in the most expensive quartile of VAMCs was twice that in the least expensive quartile (P < .001). There was no correlation between VAMC-level prescription spending and performance on HEDIS measures for lipid-lowering drugs (r = 0.12 and r = 0.07) or for diabetes agents (r = -0.10).

conclusionsDespite the existence of a closely managed formulary, significant variation in prescription spending and use of brand-name drugs exists in the VA. Although we could not explicitly risk-adjust, there appears to be no relationship between prescription spending and quality of care.

Indexed as

Confidence IntervalsCross-Sectional StudiesDiabetes MellitusEconomics, PharmaceuticalHealth Care CostsHealth ExpendituresHospitals, VeteransHumansHyperlipidemiasHypoglycemic AgentsHypolipidemic AgentsLogistic ModelsOdds RatioOutpatientsPrescription DrugsStatistics, NonparametricHypoglycemic AgentsHypolipidemic AgentsPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID20964470
PMCPMC3096004

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.