Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20963823›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of comparative neurology2010

Target selection of proprioceptive and motor axon synapses on neonatal V1-derived Ia inhibitory interneurons and Renshaw cells.

Valerie C Siembab, Courtney A Smith, Laskaro Zagoraiou, Maria C Berrocal, George Z Mentis, Francisco J Alvarez

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of comparative neurology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Compensatory scaling of modulatory neural populations in response to motor challenges.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neurochemical atlas of the rabbit spinal cord.Brain structure & function · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Neurochemical atlas of the cat spinal cord.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valerie C SiembabDepartment of Neuroscience, Cell Biology and Physiology, Boonshoft School of Medicine, Wright State University, Dayton, Ohio 45435, USA.
Courtney A Smith
Laskaro Zagoraiou
Maria C Berrocal
George Z Mentis
Francisco J Alvarez
Wright State University · USColumbia University · USNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke · US

Funding

DEVELOPMENT OF SYNAPTIC INPUTS ON SPINAL INTERNEURONSR01NS047357 · NINDS · WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ALVAREZ, FRANCISCO J · 2004 to 2025
$6.4M
CONTROL OF MOTOR NEURON DIFFERENTIATIONR01NS033245 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI JESSELL, THOMAS M. · 1994 to 2009
$3.3M
CONTROL OF MOTOR NEURON DIFFERENTIATIONR37NS033245 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI JESSELL, THOMAS M. · 2010 to 2016
$2.4M
Development of synaptic inputs on spinal interneuronsR56NS047357 · NINDS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ALVAREZ, FRANCISCO J · 2013 to 2013
$390k
Intramural NIH HHSNINDS NIH HHS NS047357NINDS NIH HHS NS33245NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS033245NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS047357NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS033245NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS047357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diversity of premotor interneurons in the mammalian spinal cord is generated from a few phylogenetically conserved embryonic classes of interneurons (V0, V1, V2, V3). Their mechanisms of diversification remain unresolved, although these are clearly important to understand motor circuit assembly in the spinal cord. Some Ia inhibitory interneurons (IaINs) and all Renshaw cells (RCs) derive from embryonic V1 interneurons; however, in adult they display distinct functional properties and synaptic inputs, for example proprioceptive inputs preferentially target IaINs, while motor axons target RCs. Previously, we found that both inputs converge on RCs in neonates, raising the possibility that proprioceptive (VGLUT1-positive) and motor axon synapses (VAChT-positive) initially target several different V1 interneurons populations and then become selected or deselected postnatally. Alternatively, specific inputs might precisely connect only with predefined groups of V1 interneurons. To test these hypotheses we analyzed synaptic development on V1-derived IaINs and compared them to RCs of the same age and spinal cord levels. V1-interneurons were labeled using genetically encoded lineage markers in mice. The results show that although neonatal V1-derived IaINs and RCs are competent to receive proprioceptive synapses, these synapses preferentially target the proximal somato-dendritic regions of IaINs and postnatally proliferate on IaINs, but not on RCs. In contrast, cholinergic synapses on RCs are specifically derived from motor axons, while on IaINs they originate from Pitx2 V0c interneurons. Thus, motor, proprioceptive, and even some interneuron inputs are biased toward specific subtypes of V1-interneurons. Postnatal strengthening of these inputs is later superimposed on this initial preferential targeting.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsGene Knock-In TechniquesInterneuronsMiceMice, TransgenicMotor NeuronsNeural InhibitionProprioceptionSpinal CordStem CellsSynaptic Transmission

Identifiers

PMID20963823
PMCPMC3038681
OpenAlexW2035204110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.