Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20963634›Full record

ArticlePharmacy world & science : PWS2010

Evaluation of three brands of drug interaction software for use in intensive care units.

Adriano Max Moreira Reis, Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drug-drug interaction software in clinical practice: a systematic review.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Drug-drug interactions in inpatient and outpatient settings in Iran: a systematic review of the literature.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2014
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Factors associated with potential drug-drug interactions in psychiatric inpatients.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of Drug Interactions in Hospitalized Patients with Malignancy.International journal of hematology-oncology and stem cell research · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A computational approach to predict multi-pathway drug-drug interactions: A case study of irinotecan, a colon cancer medication.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Adriano Max Moreira ReisFaculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Av. Antônio Carlos 6627, Campus Pampulha, 31270-010, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. amreis@farmacia.ufmg.br
Silvia Helena De Bortoli Cassiani
Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate drug interaction software programs and determine their accuracy in identifying drug-drug interactions that may occur in intensive care units. Setting The study was developed in Brazil.

methodDrug interaction software programs were identified through a bibliographic search in PUBMED and in LILACS (database related to the health sciences published in Latin American and Caribbean countries). The programs' sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were determined to assess their accuracy in detecting drug-drug interactions. The accuracy of the software programs identified was determined using 100 clinically important interactions and 100 clinically unimportant ones. Stockley's Drug Interactions 8th edition was employed as the gold standard in the identification of drug-drug interaction. MAIN OUTCOME: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values.

resultsThe programs studied were: Drug Interaction Checker (DIC), Drug-Reax (DR), and Lexi-Interact (LI). DR displayed the highest sensitivity (0.88) and DIC showed the lowest (0.69). A close similarity was observed among the programs regarding specificity (0.88-0.92) and positive predictive values (0.88-0.89). The DIC had the lowest negative predictive value (0.75) and DR the highest (0.91).

conclusionThe DR and LI programs displayed appropriate sensitivity and specificity for identifying drug-drug interactions of interest in intensive care units. Drug interaction software programs help pharmacists and health care teams in the prevention and recognition of drug-drug interactions and optimize safety and quality of care delivered in intensive care units.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsPharmaceutical PreparationsBrazilHumansIntensive Care UnitsSoftwarePharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID20963634
OpenAlexW2054429005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.