ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2011
Regional citrate anticoagulation--a safe and effective procedure in pediatric apheresis therapy.
Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of anion exchange adsorbents on regional citrate anticoagulation.The International journal of artificial organs · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) has been considered to be a standard component of pediatric apheresis therapy for more than a decade. However, data on dosing recommendations and evaluations of the effectiveness and safety of anticoagulation are rarely found in published reports. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to present our single-center experience with RCA in pediatric apheresis therapy with the aim of developing an operating procedure. Five children aged 7-14 years underwent a total of 72 (range 3-44) therapeutic apheresis sessions with RCA in the form of immunoadsorption therapy (2 patients), low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-apheresis (1 patient), and plasmapheresis (two patients). A 3% citrate solution was used. Citrate flow was started at 4.0% of the blood flow velocity and was adapted to match post-filter ionized calcium levels ≤ 0.30 mmol/l. Once the patient's ionized calcium fell to <1.05 mmol/l, an intravenous 10% calcium gluconate solution was administered. Twenty pediatric apheresis patients who received standard heparinization, matched for age, body surface area, processed plasma volume, and blood flow velocity, were enrolled in the study as a comparison group. No side effects were experienced in 72 apheresis session. The 3% citrate solution had to be reduced gradually during the apheresis session and was infused at a mean of 2.8-3.8% of the blood flow rate. Serum bicarbonate levels before and after the apheresis session with RCA [23.9 (range 18.9-30.1) vs. 26.3 (20.2-33.0) mmol/l, respectively] were significantly different (p=0.013). All patients required intravenous calcium substitution to maintain serum calcium levels within the physiological range. Due to the administration of the 3% citrate solution and calcium, all patients significantly gained weight during the procedure, with a median weight gain of 2.5% (p<0.001). The extra fluid load caused problems in patients with kidney failure. Our regimen with RCA is safe, feasible, and effective in pediatric therapeutic apheresis therapy. For RCA in apheresis, we recommend (1) a citrate (3%) flow of 3.3% of the blood flow, (2) prophylactic intravenous calcium substitution from the beginning, and (3) a more highly concentrated citrate solution in the case of oliguric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.