Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20962839›Full record

ArticleNature2010

The energetics of genome complexity.

Nick Lane, William Martin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 555 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
555citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

555 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Coevolution of Codependent Hosts and Symbionts.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Energetics and evolution: Response to Martin.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Bioenergetics · 2026
    Article
  18. Demand-only energetics at 120 ATP per glucose: A reply to Lynch.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Bioenergetics · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

495 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nick LaneDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, Gower Street, London W1E 6BT, UK. nick.lane@ucl.ac.uk
William Martin

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All complex life is composed of eukaryotic (nucleated) cells. The eukaryotic cell arose from prokaryotes just once in four billion years, and otherwise prokaryotes show no tendency to evolve greater complexity. Why not? Prokaryotic genome size is constrained by bioenergetics. The endosymbiosis that gave rise to mitochondria restructured the distribution of DNA in relation to bioenergetic membranes, permitting a remarkable 200,000-fold expansion in the number of genes expressed. This vast leap in genomic capacity was strictly dependent on mitochondrial power, and prerequisite to eukaryote complexity: the key innovation en route to multicellular life.

Indexed as

Energy MetabolismModels, BiologicalAerobiosisAnaerobiosisAnimalsCell NucleusCell SizeEukaryotic CellsGene ExpressionGenes, MitochondrialGenomeHumansMitochondriaProkaryotic CellsSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID20962839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.