Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20962583›Full record

ReviewAutophagy2011

Autophagy in protists.

Michael Duszenko, Michael L Ginger, Ana Brennand, Melisa Gualdrón-López, María Isabel Colombo, Graham H Coombs, Isabelle Coppens, Bamini Jayabalasingham, Gordon Langsley, Solange Lisboa de Castro and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Autophagy, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 156 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Isolation and characterization ofAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.

Michael DuszenkoInterfaculty Institute for Biochemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Michael L Ginger
Ana Brennand
Melisa Gualdrón-López
María Isabel Colombo
Graham H Coombs
Isabelle Coppens
Bamini Jayabalasingham
Gordon Langsley
Solange Lisboa de Castro
Rubem Menna-Barreto
Jeremy C Mottram
Miguel Navarro
Daniel J Rigden
Patricia S Romano
Veronika Stoka
Boris Turk
Paul A M Michels
Johns Hopkins University · USJožef Stefan Institute · SICentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARde Duve Institute · BEFaculdades Oswaldo Cruz · BRGlasgow Life · GBHospital for Tropical Diseases · VNInstituto de Parasitología y Biomedicina "López - Neyra" · ESLancaster University · GBSociedade Brasileira de Biologia Celular · BRUCLouvain · BEUniversidad de Ciencias Medicas · CRUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Tübingen · DEWellcome Trust · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700127Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 075820/A/04/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autophagy is the degradative process by which eukaryotic cells digest their own components using acid hydrolases within the lysosome. Originally thought to function almost exclusively in providing starving cells with nutrients taken from their own cellular constituents, autophagy is in fact involved in numerous cellular events including differentiation, turnover of macromolecules and organelles, and defense against parasitic invaders. During the last 10-20 years, molecular components of the autophagic machinery have been discovered, revealing a complex interactome of proteins and lipids, which, in a concerted way, induce membrane formation to engulf cellular material and target it for lysosomal degradation. Here, our emphasis is autophagy in protists. We discuss experimental and genomic data indicating that the canonical autophagy machinery characterized in animals and fungi appeared prior to the radiation of major eukaryotic lineages. Moreover, we describe how comparative bioinformatics revealed that this canonical machinery has been subject to moderation, outright loss or elaboration on multiple occasions in protist lineages, most probably as a consequence of diverse lifestyle adaptations. We also review experimental studies illustrating how several pathogenic protists either utilize autophagy mechanisms or manipulate host-cell autophagy in order to establish or maintain infection within a host. The essentiality of autophagy for the pathogenicity of many parasites, and the unique features of some of the autophagy-related proteins involved, suggest possible new targets for drug discovery. Further studies of the molecular details of autophagy in protists will undoubtedly enhance our understanding of the diversity and complexity of this cellular phenomenon and the opportunities it offers as a drug target.

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsEukaryotic CellsEvolution, MolecularGenomeHost-Parasite InteractionsParasites

Identifiers

PMID20962583
PMCPMC3039767
OpenAlexW2026984235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.