Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20962212›Full record

Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2010

Influenza and meningococcal vaccinations are effective in healthy subjects treated with the interleukin-1 beta-blocking antibody canakinumab: results of an open-label, parallel group, randomized, single-center study.

A Chioato, E Noseda, S D Felix, M Stevens, G Del Giudice, S Fitoussi, A Kleinschmidt

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vaccines · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Adjuvanted influenza vaccines.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

A ChioatoNovartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Translational Science, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland. andrea.chioato@novartis.com
E Noseda
S D Felix
M Stevens
G Del Giudice
S Fitoussi
A Kleinschmidt
Novartis (Switzerland) · CHNovartis (Germany) · DENovartis (Italy) · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of influenza and meningococcal vaccines in healthy subjects exposed to the anti-interleukin-1β (anti-IL-1β) monoclonal antibody canakinumab. This was an open-label, parallel group, randomized, single-center study of healthy subjects (aged 18 to 45 years). At baseline, antibody (Ab) titers were measured and subjects were randomized (1:1) to a single 300-mg canakinumab dose administered subcutaneously (s.c.) or received no treatment (control group). After 2 weeks, subjects were treated with inactivated, unadjuvanted influenza and conjugated group C meningococcal (MenC) vaccines, administered intramuscularly (i.m.). The primary efficacy variable was the response (≥ 2-fold increase in Ab titer in ≥ 2 of 3 influenza virus strains) after 4 weeks in subjects treated with canakinumab compared to the control group. Secondary efficacy variables were the antibody response to vaccines at different thresholds and time points. Fifty-one of 112 subjects screened were randomized to canakinumab (n = 25) or the control group (n = 26). Antibody responses to vaccinations measured against different influenza virus strains and one MenC strain at 4 weeks were comparable in the canakinumab and control groups. The primary efficacy variable, the response to influenza vaccination (≥ 2-fold increase in Ab titer in ≥ 2 of 3 serotypes) at 4 weeks, was shown in 24/25 subjects in the canakinumab group compared to 25/25 subjects in the control group. Antibody responses remained comparable in the two groups at the different time points assessed. Headache was the most frequently reported adverse event. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported during the study. We concluded that a single dose of 300 mg canakinumab s.c. does not affect the induction or persistence of antibody responses after vaccination with unadjuvanted influenza or alum-adjuvanted MenC vaccines in healthy subjects.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, BlockingAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, ViralDrug InteractionsFemaleHeadacheHuman ExperimentationHumansImmunologic FactorsInfluenza VaccinesInjections, IntramuscularAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, BlockingAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, ViralcanakinumabImmunologic FactorsInfluenza VaccinesInterleukin-1betaMeningococcal VaccinesVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID20962212
PMCPMC3008193
OpenAlexW2105693411

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.