Transcatheter aortic valves—where do we go from here?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. How to define a poor outcome after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: conceptual framework and empirical observations from the placement of aortic transcatheter valve (PARTNER) trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes · 2013
   Trial
2. Evaluating TAVI outcomes-not just a matter of life and death.Annals of translational medicine · 2017
   Article
3. The impact of transcatheter aortic valve implantation on quality of life: results from the German transcatheter aortic valve interventions registry.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2015
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery.2010

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as