Evidence map›Paper›PMID 20959891›Full record

SynthesisDeutsches Arzteblatt international2010

The role of vitamin D in cancer prevention: does UV protection conflict with the need to raise low levels of vitamin D?

Hajo Zeeb, Rüdiger Greinert

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Public Health Messages Associated with Low UV Index Values Need Reconsideration.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Is there an epidemic vitamin D deficiency in German orthopaedic patients?Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2013
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A dermatologist's perspective on vitamin D.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Correspondence (letter to the editor): Benefits outweigh risks.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011
    Article
  14. Correspondence (reply): In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011
    Article
  15. Further potentially carcinogenic effects of chronodisruption.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hajo ZeebBremer Institut für Präventionsforschung und Sozialmedizin (BIPS), Universität Bremen, Linzer Strasse 10, 28359 Bremen, Germany. zeeb@bips.uni-bremen.de
Rüdiger Greinert
Deutsche Gesellschaft für ErnährungUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVitamin D is essential for life. Part of the body's supply of vitamin D is ingested in food, but UV induced vitamin D synthesis in the body plays an even more important role. UV irradiation is a cause for the currently rising incidence of skin cancer in many countries; on the other hand, Vitamin D might be protective against some cancers. In this paper we summarize the current data on vitamin D and cancer and on the vitamin D status of populations in Europe and discuss whether current recommendations on UV protection require changes.

methodsIn 2008, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published a systematic review on vitamin D and cancer. We describe its main findings and review additional publications retrieved by a selective literature search on vitamin D, UV light, and skin cancer. In addition, we systematically review the current recommendations on vitamin D supplementation.

resultsHigher vitamin D levels are associated with a lower risk of colon cancer. For breast cancer, the situation is less clear. In general, higher vitamin D levels are associated with lower overall mortality. Concerning optimal Vitamin D levels, serum values ≥ 50 nmol/L (ie.. ≥ 20 ng/mL) are frequently discussed, and a few authors favor markedly higher values. Brief UV exposures are usually adequate for endogenous vitamin D synthesis.

conclusionMore research is needed into the possible protective effects of vitamin D against cancer. Brief, daily UV exposure stimulates vitamin D production and causes negligible skin damage. Raising the vitamin D level even further by extended solar UV exposure or irradiation in a solarium is inadvisable because of the risk of skin cancer. Oral vitamin D supplementation can be considered as an alternative, particularly for persons at high risk, such as the elderly and members of certain ethnic groups.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsChildCross-Cultural ComparisonDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNutrition SurveysPregnancySunscreening AgentsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID20959891
PMCPMC2956195
OpenAlexW2134933560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.