ArticleExperimental and clinical cardiology2010
Left atrial size and force in patients with systolic chronic heart failure: Comparison with healthy controls and different cardiac diseases.
Article in Experimental and clinical cardiology, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Deep learning of left atrial structure and function provides link to atrial fibrillation risk.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Decreased Left Atrial Reservoir Strain Is Associated with Adverse Outcomes in Restrictive Cardiomyopathy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Association of left atrial volume index and all-cause mortality in patients referred for routine cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a multicenter study.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2019Article
- Atrial remodelling in heart failure: recent developments and relevance for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2018Article
- Different determinants of exercise capacity in HFpEF compared to HFrEF.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2017Article
- Echocardiographic markers of inducible myocardial ischemia at baseline evaluation preparatory to exercise stress echocardiography.Cardiovascular ultrasound · 2016Article
- Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of outcomes in patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy: A single centre, six month follow-up study.Indian heart journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLeft atrial (LA) systolic force (LASF) is significantly increased in chronic heart failure (CHF), arterial hypertension (HT) and aortic stenosis (AS). The increase is proportional to the degree of left ventricular hypertrophy and diastolic dysfunction.
objectivesTo assess the magnitude of changes in maximal LA volume (LAV(max)) and LASF in systolic CHF compared with other cardiac diseases, and to assess whether the left atrium remodels differently and works in response to specific conditions affecting diastolic function and to individual factors associated with LA alterations.
methodsLAV(max) and LASF were measured and evaluated by two-dimensional Doppler echocardiography in 94 patients with systolic CHF and normal left ventricular filling pressure, 100 control patients, 181 patients with HT, 40 patients with idiopathic hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCMP) and 85 patients with AS. The prevalence of LA dilation and supernormal LASF (defined as values of LAV(max) and LASF exceeding two SDs of the mean of controls) was measured in all groups.
resultsLAV(max) and LASF were 7.1±2 mL/m(3) and 7.8±4 kdynes in controls, and 11.0±4 mL/m(3) and 19.7±11 kdynes in systolic CHF patients, respectively (both P<0.001). These values were significantly higher than in patients with HT, but similar to those with AS and HCMP. LA dilation and supernormal LASF were detected in 13% and 11% of patients with HT, 32% and 59% of patients with AS, 26% and 43% of patients with HCMP, and 41% and 56% of patients with systolic CHF, respectively (all P<0.01). In multiple logistic analysis, systolic CHF represented the strongest predictor of supernormal LASF. It was not independently associated with LA dilation, which was mainly related to indexes of volume load.
conclusionsLAV(max) and LASF were markedly increased in patients with systolic CHF, with a magnitude that was significantly higher than that of HT patients, but similar to that measured in HCMP and AS patients. In the present community population with various cardiac diseases, systolic CHF represented the most powerful stimulus for increasing LASF and was not related to LA dilation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
20959879PMC2954028W1553218724What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.